EU銀行セクターにおける企業サステナビリティ報告指令(CSRD)の採用:実証的調査
The Adoption of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive by the EU Banking Sector: An Empirical Investigation (原題)
Nicola Fiore, Stefano Marciano, Giuseppe Scandurra, Antonio Thomas
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はEU最大手20行のサステナビリティ開示が統合報告の原則とどの程度整合するかを実証的に評価した。非財務開示の整合性は総じて高いが、銀行間・論点間で差が大きく、特に見通し(outlook)と形式的・方法論的品質に乖離が見られた。銀行は融資先企業への波及効果が大きいため、政策当局に対し財務・非財務開示の連携を促す仕組みの提案を促す示唆を与える。
English
This study empirically assesses how far the sustainability disclosure of the 20 largest EU banks aligns with integrated reporting principles, as a proxy for voluntary disclosure quality under CSRD. Consistency is generally high but varies widely across banks and topics, with the largest gaps in outlook and formal/methodological quality. Given banks' leverage over borrowers, the findings urge policymakers to promote tools linking financial and non-financial disclosure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EUのCSRD・統合報告の実務知見は、SSBJ基準や有報・統合報告書での非財務情報拡充を進める日本企業・金融機関にとって直接的な参照枠となる。特に銀行の融資先への波及効果という視点は、日本の金融機関がトランジション・ファイナンスで果たす役割を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper speaks directly to the global disclosure-infrastructure agenda (CSRD, ISSB, integrated reporting) by quantifying how banks actually comply and where quality gaps remain. It adds empirical evidence on the financial sector's role as a transmission channel for sustainability standards to borrowers, relevant to transition-finance debates worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CSRD準拠度と統合報告原則の整合性を定量化した実証手法と、銀行開示の品質ギャップの類型が参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:銀行・金融機関の開示担当者は、見通し情報と方法論的品質の弱点を自己診断するベンチマークとして活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:CSRD運用において、財務・非財務開示の連携を促す制度設計やガイダンスの必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Citizens’ growing sensitivity to sustainability issues requests EU authorities to issue increasingly stringent regulations for companies to delimit the concept of sustainable development. The CSRD is the latest development of an exhaustive framework concerning the provision of a wide range of issues. Although the CSRD refers to specific standards to show companies’ compliance level with the ESG, it does not ensure they consider sustainability as a strategic lever capable of generating competitive value and transforming business models. For this reason, accountability scholars are promoting a more complex tool named integrated reporting, finalized to integrate financial with non-financial information. This study aims to evaluate the consistence of sustainability disclosure among the largest twenty EU banks with the integrated reporting guiding principles and indirectly the qualitative level of voluntary disclosure. The interest in the banking sector is linked to their strong direct sustainability impact, but also to the leading role towards the multitude of companies borrowing money, inducing them to follow sustainability principles. The findings of the study show that the consistence of non-financial disclosure with principles are quite high, although wide differences among banks exist, as well as among the issues considered. Particularly, the wider gaps concern the outlook and the formal and methodological quality. Many implications emerge from this research stimulating policy makers to propose tools encouraging banks to improve the linkages among financial and non-financial disclosure.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18199722first seen 2026-09-24 04:46:32
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/su18199722first seen 2026-09-26 05:09:42 · last seen 2026-09-29 05:18:06
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。