Comparative assessment of the environmental sustainability of Russian companies producing mineral fertilizers
ロシアの鉱物肥料生産企業の環境持続可能性の比較評価 (AI 翻訳)
Ekaterina V. PERFIL'EVA
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ロシアの鉱物肥料生産企業5社の環境持続可能性を統合指標で評価。GHG排出、エネルギー効率、水利用、廃棄物管理、ESG開示などを考慮し、企業間格差を明確化。技術革新とESG変革が持続可能性向上に寄与することを示した。
English
This paper assesses the environmental sustainability of five Russian mineral fertilizer producers using an integral indicator based on GHG emissions, energy efficiency, water use, waste management, and ESG disclosure. It finds significant differentiation, with leaders adopting eco-friendly technologies and robust ESG practices. Technological modernization and ESG transformation are key drivers.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
ロシア企業対象だが、統合的評価枠組みは日本企業のESG開示やGX戦略にも応用可能。肥料業界は日本でも重要であり、国際比較の視点として参考になる。
In the global GX context
This study offers a replicable integral indicator for assessing environmental sustainability in the fertilizer industry, contributing to global ESG disclosure and transition finance discussions. It highlights the importance of high-quality ESG reporting and technological innovation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers can adopt the integral indicator methodology for other industries or regions.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams in the fertilizer sector can benchmark against these practices.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can understand how ESG frameworks drive environmental performance in the chemical industry.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Subject. Environmental sustainability of Russian companies producing mineral fertilizers. Objectives. Development of an integral indicator of the environmental sustainability of Russian companies in the industry, taking into account the multifactorial environmental burden, technological level and maturity of ESG approaches, identification of differences in the levels of environmental sustainability of companies, identification of their strengths and weaknesses and the formation of grounds for further optimization of environmental policy. Methods. General scientific research methods were used. The empirical base includes official reports from PhosAgro, EuroChem, Uralchem, Akron and KuibyshevAzot. Results. A system of criteria for environmental sustainability has been defined, reflecting key aspects: the total costs of environmental protection and compensation of environmental impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, water use, waste management, biodiversity conservation, the use of environmentally friendly technologies and the introduction of sustainable fertilizers, compliance with environmental standards, the quality of ESG disclosure and the assessment of ESG indicators of mineral producers fertilizers in industry and international ESG ratings. An integral indicator is formed based on certain weighting coefficients. The study revealed a pronounced differentiation of the industry in terms of environmental sustainability. The leaders are companies with active implementation of eco-friendly technologies and high-quality ESG technology. Conclusions. Increasing the level of environmental sustainability of industry enterprises is possible with a combination of technological modernization, ESG transformation and improvement of corporate strategies. The developed integral indicator can serve as a tool for evaluating the effectiveness of environmental solutions and supporting industry regulation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.24891/xepvjgfirst seen 2026-05-15 19:05:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。