サステナビリティ報告における財務・非財務指標の分析
Analysis of Financial and Non-Financial Metrics in Sustainability Reporting (原題)
Sofiіa Kafka
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、CSRD/ESRSとOmnibus Iに基づくダブルマテリアリティを踏まえ、非財務報告を戦略管理に統合するための分析手法を提案する。ESRSマテリアリティ評価、専門家評価、統計感度を組み合わせたハイブリッド加重と複合指標法を用い、ウクライナのOschadbankの2024年データで検証した。統合的経済レジリエンス指数を提案し、因果連関マトリクスと指標パスポートカードで宣言的開示のリスクを低減する。
English
This paper proposes an analytical methodology to integrate non-financial reporting into strategic management under CSRD/ESRS and Omnibus I, based on double materiality. Using hybrid weighting combining ESRS materiality, expert evaluation, and statistical sensitivity, it constructs a composite Integrated Economic Resilience Index, validated on JSC Oschadbank 2024 data. The approach includes causal linkage matrices and indicator passports to reduce declarative disclosure risks, transforming sustainability reporting into a tool for resilience and long-term value.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示が始まる中、ESRSのダブルマテリアリティや複合指標の考え方は、今後の有報・統合報告書での非財務情報の戦略的活用に示唆を与える。特に、単なるコンプライアンスではなく経営管理に結び付ける方法論は、日本の実務者にとって参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on CSRD implementation by offering a concrete methodology for moving beyond compliance to strategic use of sustainability data. Its composite indexing and hybrid weighting approach could inform ISSB-aligned reporting practices and enhance the credibility of non-financial disclosures.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured methodology for integrated ESG analysis and composite index construction, useful for further empirical testing.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical framework for building materiality-oriented indicator systems and integrating them into strategic management.
🏛政策担当者:Illustrates how CSRD can drive analytical innovation, potentially informing future regulatory guidance.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The contemporary model of analysis is undergoing transformation driven by the European regulatory changes the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), and the Omnibus I package, which have institutionalised the principle of double materiality and shifted the centre of gravity of corporate assessment from retrospective financial diagnostics towards an integrated evaluation of impacts, risks and opportunities. The methodological problem arises of developing an analytical toolkit capable of moving non-financial reporting from the domain of regulatory compliance into the domain of strategic management. The research is based on the principle of methodological triangulation, which involves combining procedural, statistical and expert methods according to the nature of the data analysed. A systemic approach has been applied to the formation of a three-level architecture of analysed indicators, encompassing the normative core, the sectoral materiality contour and the internal managerial contour, alongside hybrid weighting that combines materiality assessment under ESRS, expert evaluations and statistical sensitivity of indicators, as well as the composite indexing method for aggregating the results. Empirical validation was performed on the data of JSC Oschadbank for 2024. A methodology for integrated analysis of the system of financial, non-financial and ESG indicators has been substantiated, comprising six sequential stages - contextualisation, materiality assessment, construction of the indicator system, operationalisation and normalisation of data, integration of results into composite indices, and interpretation and incorporation of conclusions into the strategic management system. A composite Integrated Economic Resilience Index of the enterprise has been proposed, combining the financial, non-financial operational, environmental, social and governance blocks of information on the basis of hybrid weighting coefficients. The use of a causal linkage matrix and indicator passport cards has been substantiated as instruments for reducing the risk of declarative disclosures. The methodology of integrated analysis of financial, non-financial and ESG indicators under the implementation of CSRD reporting should be constructed as a multi-level, materiality-oriented analytical system whose fundamental distinction from traditional analysis lies in its capacity to simultaneously assess results, drivers, risks, external effects and structural constraints of the value creation process. The proposed author’s approach demonstrates its practical value in the ability to transform sustainability reporting from a formal compliance obligation into a fully-fledged instrument for enhancing the resilience and long-term value of the enterprise.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2026.03.129first seen 2026-09-02 04:56:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。