gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Climate goals in ruminant agriculture: the complicated science of goal setting

反すう畜農業における気候目標:目標設定の複雑な科学 (AI 翻訳)

L. R. Thompson, C. M. Salisbury, M. Beck

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-02-03#グリーンウォッシュ
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2026.1718477
原典: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1718477

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、反すう畜産における企業の気候目標設定の複雑さを議論する。目標設定は社会的ライセンスの向上に寄与するが、グリーンウォッシングの懸念や生産者の認識不足が課題である。透明性と科学的アプローチの重要性を強調する。

English

This paper discusses the complexity of corporate climate goal setting in ruminant livestock production. While goal setting helps improve social license, concerns about greenwashing and lack of producer awareness pose challenges. The authors emphasize the need for transparency and a science-based approach.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では牛肉生産の規模は限られるが、輸入牛肉のスコープ3排出やサプライチェーン目標設定の参考となる。グリーンウォッシング規制強化の動きにも関連。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper contributes to the debate on credible climate goals and greenwashing. It highlights the tension between corporate targets and producer realities, relevant for frameworks like ISSB and CSRD that require transparency in goal claims.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework linking goal setting to social license, useful for studying corporate climate commitments.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on setting credible goals and engaging with producers to avoid greenwashing accusations.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests the need for standards around climate goal transparency to prevent misleading claims.

📄 Abstract(原文)

In recent years, the concern over the climate impact of ruminant livestock production has caused a drastic change in corporate actions. Companies that are involved in the production of beef now commonly have company climate goals aimed at some level of greenhouse gas emission reduction or outright “net-zero” or “climate neutrality” targets. Setting these targets have also caused considerable concern with some stakeholders with claims of greenwashing and lawsuits arising. Additionally, the individuals who will ultimately be responsible for these companies achieving their targets, the producer, has little idea these targets are being set yet alone the practice suite needed to achieve them. This has created an environment that leads to confusion for stakeholders and ever-evolving benchmarks for what is acceptable or not. We discuss this complicated science of ruminant livestock climate goal setting, within the larger framework of achieving the goals set by the Paris Climate Accord and companies’ desires to improve their social license to operate. Viewing this process as an extension of the industries desire to extend and/or improve their social license to operate, the desire for companies to set goals is rational and, conversely, the push back is fair and a part of the evolving value set of society. However, all parties would benefit by improving on key aspects of the social license, such as improving transparency, engaging with those stakeholders with differing views, and maintaining a science based approach.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。