Integrating Occupational Health and Safety into ESG Social Performance: A BRSR-Based Assessment Framework for Manufacturing Industries
製造業における労働安全衛生をESG社会的パフォーマンスに統合するBRSRベースの評価フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
H. Tatsad
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、製造業における労働安全衛生(OHS)をESG社会的パフォーマンスに統合するためのBRSRベースの評価フレームワークを提案する。5つの次元(ガバナンス、リスク管理、従業員福利、安全文化、ESG報告・開示)と、遅行・先行指標を用いた5段階成熟度モデルを提示し、企業の持続可能性評価と開示品質向上に資する。AI予測分析も言及されるが、フレームワークの主眼はOHS統合にある。
English
This paper proposes a BRSR-based assessment framework integrating Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) into ESG social performance for manufacturing industries. It defines five dimensions (Governance, Risk Management, Employee Well-being, Safety Culture, and ESG Reporting) and a five-level maturity model with lagging and leading indicators. The framework aims to enhance workforce sustainability, stakeholder confidence, and ESG disclosure quality, supporting SDGs 3, 8, and 12.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJが社会情報開示基準を検討中で、OHS指標の体系化が求められる。本フレームワークは製造業に特化した実践的な評価ツールを提供し、日本の労働安全衛生法やVDTガイドラインと組み合わせることで、企業のESG報告強化に応用可能である。
In the global GX context
Globally, ESG social dimension remains underdeveloped compared to environmental metrics. This BRSR-based framework offers a structured approach to integrate OHS into ESG reporting, applicable beyond India. It aligns with growing investor focus on social performance and can inform ISSB's social disclosure standards.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive OHS-ESG integration model and maturity assessment for manufacturing, useful for developing social sustainability metrics.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical framework to assess and improve OHS maturity, benchmark safety performance, and enhance ESG disclosure for manufacturing firms.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for standardized OHS indicators in ESG frameworks, relevant for regulators developing social disclosure requirements.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is increasingly recognized as a strategic component of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance, particularly within manufacturing industries where employees face physical, chemical, ergonomic, and psychosocial risks. Although ESG reporting has gained global importance, the social dimension remains comparatively underdeveloped, and workplace safety is often treated as a compliance requirement rather than a sustainability driver. This paper proposes a Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR)-based assessment framework for integrating OHS into ESG social performance in manufacturing organizations. The study reviews ESG concepts, BRSR and BRSR Core requirements, ISO 45001 principles, ESG rating methodologies, safety leadership, psychological safety, contractor safety, Industry 4.0 technologies, and AI-based predictive safety analytics. The proposed ESG-OHS framework consists of five dimensions: Governance, Risk Management, Employee Well-being, Safety Culture, and ESG Reporting and Disclosure. It incorporates both lagging indicators, such as LTIFR, TRIR, severity rate, and occupational disease rate, and leading indicators, including near-miss reporting, safety training, safety observations, corrective action closure, employee participation, and mental well-being measures. A five-level ESG-OHS maturity model is also proposed, ranging from compliance-driven safety management to ESG leadership. The framework provides manufacturing organizations with a practical tool to assess workforce sustainability, benchmark OHS maturity, strengthen stakeholder confidence, and improve ESG disclosure quality. The study concludes that integrating OHS into ESG reporting can enhance employee well-being, operational resilience, contractor safety, and long-term corporate sustainability, while supporting SDG 3, SDG 8, and SDG 12.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.81511first seen 2026-06-21 05:48:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。