Sustainability for whom? Power, risk, and ESG investing in rental housing
誰のためのサステナビリティか？賃貸住宅における権力、リスク、ESG投資 (AI 翻訳)
J. Parish, Aretousa Bloom, Cam-Tu Nguyen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本報告は、ESG投資が賃貸住宅の金融化・資産化を促進する仕組みを批判的に検討する。56本の学術論文の統合とカナダ・EU・米国の規制枠組み比較から、ESGが環境・社会課題を金融価値に変換する社会技術的インフラであると論じる。脱炭素と住宅の手頃さ・居住者の権利の緊張を指摘し、社会的公正を組み込んだガバナンスの必要性を強調する。
English
This report critically examines how ESG investing shapes rental housing financialization and assetization. Synthesizing 56 academic articles and comparing regulatory frameworks in Canada, the EU, and the US, it argues ESG is a socio-technical infrastructure translating environmental and social concerns into financial value. It highlights tensions between decarbonization, affordability, and housing rights, calling for governance reforms that strengthen public accountability and tenant participation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、ESG投資が不動産セクターに浸透しつつあり、賃貸住宅市場でもサステナビリティ指標の導入が進む可能性がある。本報告は、SSBJ開示や投資家対応において、社会的側面（テナントの権利、 affordability）を軽視しないための示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this report contributes to critical ESG scholarship by exposing how ESG frameworks may prioritize financial materiality over social justice in housing. It offers a comparative lens for policymakers and investors in jurisdictions adopting ISSB/CSRD standards, urging attention to tenant rights and social washing risks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ESGと金融化の批判的理論を提供し、住宅分野のサステナビリティ研究に示唆を与える。
🏢実務担当者:不動産投資・ESG評価において、社会的リスクとテナント排除の防止策を検討する際の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:住宅政策と持続可能な金融の統合を考える際、社会的公正と説明責任の重要性を認識すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing is increasingly shaping how housing and real estate are financed, developed, and governed. This report examines the emergence of ESG in rental housing, asking how ESG reshapes relationships between financial markets, governments, housing providers, and tenants, and what this means for social and environmental justice. Drawing on a narrative synthesis of 56 academic articles and a comparative review of ESG regulatory frameworks in Canada, the European Union, and the United States, the report situates ESG within broader processes of housing financialization and assetization. We argue that ESG is not an alternative to financialization, but a socio-technical infrastructure through which environmental and social concerns are translated into metrics of financial value and risk. The review identifies several intersecting logics, including carbon and social logics, short- and long-term investment horizons, and firm- and system-level approaches to risk. While ESG may encourage investment in energy efficiency, climate resilience, and social value, it can also narrow sustainability to what is measurable and financially material. In rental housing, this creates risks of social washing, tenant exclusion, and tensions between decarbonization, affordability, and housing rights. The report concludes by highlighting the need to examine ESG as a form of governance and to strengthen public accountability, tenant participation, and social justice within sustainable finance and housing policy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://carleton.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/9c4cdd53-22ba-4c83-8ed4-8920b691572b/downloadfirst seen 2026-08-15 05:39:01 · last seen 2026-08-16 05:47:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。