Climate‐Related Risk Reporting and the Role of Management Accountants
気候関連リスク報告と管理会計士の役割 (AI 翻訳)
Jayanthi Kumarasiri, Leanne Morrison, Laura Maran
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、オーストラリア企業がTCFDフレームワークに基づく気候関連リスク報告の自主的段階でどのように準備を進めたかを、管理会計士の関与に焦点を当てて調査した。18名の上級管理職へのインタビューから、企業は内部・外部の課題に直面し、外部コンサルタントに依存する傾向がある一方、管理会計士の関与が著しく低く、気候リスクへの対応が象徴的であることが明らかになった。管理会計士の役割強化が実質的な気候行動につながる可能性を示唆している。
English
This study examines how Australian companies prepared for voluntary climate-related risk reporting under the TCFD framework, focusing on the role of management accountants. Interviews with 18 senior managers reveal that companies faced internal and external challenges, relied heavily on external consultants, and showed minimal involvement of management accountants, indicating a symbolic rather than substantive approach to climate risk. The findings suggest that enhancing the role of management accountants can promote more meaningful climate actions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準の策定が進み、2025年以降の有報での気候関連開示義務化が目前である。本論文は、管理会計士の関与不足が実質的な気候リスク管理を阻害する可能性を示しており、日本企業が開示対応を単なるコンプライアンス業務と捉えず、経営管理プロセスに統合するための示唆を提供する。
In the global GX context
With ISSB standards (IFRS S2) being adopted globally and mandatory climate disclosure expanding (e.g., CSRD, SEC), this paper highlights a critical gap: management accountants' limited involvement in climate risk reporting. It underscores the risk of symbolic compliance and offers insights for companies and standard-setters on integrating climate risks into core management accounting practices.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the gap between TCFD adoption and substantive management accountant involvement, offering a foundation for further research on organizational change and climate governance.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for companies to involve management accountants in climate risk management to move beyond symbolic compliance and build robust internal processes.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that standard-setters and regulators should consider guidance or requirements that ensure management accountants are actively engaged in climate-related risk reporting.
📄 Abstract(原文)
ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to provide evidence of how Australian companies prepared themselves for climate‐related risk reporting in its early voluntary stages, with a particular focus on the role of management accountants and whether the approach adopted by management was likely to equip these companies well for the disclosure requirements of the standards that followed. The Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Framework, issued in 2017, signalled to companies the importance of preparing for change in climate‐related risk reporting. The subsequent International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Standard IFRS S2 Climate‐Related Disclosure requirements issued in 2023 and its (phased) mandated Australian Sustainability Reporting Standard counterpart AASB S2 of the same name rely heavily on the concepts embedded in the TCFD Framework. In 2021, we interviewed 18 senior managers involved in climate‐related risk reporting as well as two managers from consultancy firms providing advisory services on this topic. The interview data revealed that management encountered both internal and external challenges in implementing climate‐related risk reporting and increasingly engaged external consulting firms to develop scenario analyses and enhance their climate resilience reporting. The findings reveal a significant lack of involvement from management accountants in companies' climate change risk management activities, indicating a more symbolic than substantive approach to addressing climate risks. The interviews provide insights into how the role of management accountants in climate‐change risk management can be enhanced to promote more significant and substantive climate actions within their companies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。