The relationship between non-financial factors and technological innovation expenditures (CAPEXtech) and the level of technological innovation (TI Index) in logistics companies. Panel analysis for international markets

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:This paper offers a rigorous panel econometric analysis of ESG-investment linkages in the logistics sector, providing a methodological template and cross-regional comparative findings.

🏢実務担当者:Logistics firms can use these findings to justify shifting spending from capital-intensive assets to digital and ESG-aligned projects, with region-specific strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the role of strong corporate governance in enabling effective ESG-linked investment; regionally differentiated incentives may be needed.

Motives: The growing importance of sustainable development and corporate responsibility positions ESG factors (environmental, social, and corporate governance) as key determinants of investment decisions. Companies increasingly incorporate non‑financial, ESG‑related performance measures into strategic and operational decision‑making processes, which raises an important research question. The analyses examined the impact of environmental, social, and corporate governance factors (ESG, ENV, CSR, CG), alongside financial variables (CR, asset turnover), on firms’ investment decisions. Two parallel econometric approaches were applied: fixed‑effects panel models (FE) and system SUR (Seemingly Unrelated Regressions) models. Aim: The aim of the article is to provide an empirical assessment of the relationship between innovation and technology‑related expenditures (CAPEXtech), the level of technological innovativeness measured by the TI Index, and disclosures in the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) domains. The analysis covers logistics companies operating in Europe, the Asia‑Pacific region, and North America (the United States and Canada) over the period 2017–2024. Results: The results indicate that managers should shift their focus from capital‑intensive investments to qualitative, modernization, and digital projects that align with growing ESG requirements and ensure higher capital efficiency. Strong corporate governance effects confirm the need to strengthen oversight mechanisms and increase selectivity in investment decisions. Investment strategies should be regionally tailored and managed holistically, taking into account interdependencies between different types of investments, which enables firms to respond more effectively to market volatility and build competitive advantage.

• semanticscholar https://czasopisma.uwm.edu.pl/index.php/aspal/article/download/12178/9018first seen 2026-07-18 07:42:22