Ethical Leadership and Financial Resilience: The Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Financial Distress

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:This paper provides empirical evidence on the relationship between ESG and financial distress using OLS, but researchers should note the endogeneity concerns and limited sample size.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use these findings to justify ESG investments as a risk management tool that protects against financial distress.

🏛政策担当者:Regulators should consider that ESG performance may serve as an early warning indicator for financial stability, supporting disclosure mandates.

While extensive literature has investigated the association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and a company’s financial performance, there is a noticeable scarcity of empirical research on the role of CSR in mitigating firms’ risk of financial bankruptcy. Given that modern business leadership is increasingly defined by its commitment to ethics, this study investigated whether an ethical and sustainable approach to business leadership reduces corporate financial distress. Using a panel dataset of 70 large-cap United States firms listed in the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 index over 2018 to 2022, the study investigated the relationship between CSR activities, measured by the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings, and the probability of business failure. This inquiry rests on the premise that business leadership must prioritize ethical standards to ensure organizational longevity. In this context, ESG performance is analyzed as a tangible outcome of corporate ethics. Financial distress is measured using two widely employed metrics from the Altman and Zmijewski models, respectively. The ordinary least squares (OLS) method was employed following panel data validation tests. The empirical findings consistently indicated proactive engagement in social and environmental goals safeguards against potential financial distress, supporting stakeholder-oriented theories of the firm and validating the financial utility of ethical standards. However, the results also revealed substantial differences in explanatory power across bankruptcy models, with the Zmijewski score outperforming the Altman Z-score in terms of goodness of fit. Overall, the findings contribute to the growing literature linking CSR to corporate risk management and demonstrate how proactive business leadership fosters resilience through ethics. The empirical evidence presented here carries significant weight for administrative leaders, capital providers, and legislative bodies concerned with transparency, trust, leadership quality, corporate resilience, and long-term sustainability.

• semanticscholar https://armgpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/BEL_1_2026_5.pdffirst seen 2026-07-18 07:50:39