Innovation‐Led Sustainability in the Agri‐Food Sector: Evidence From the Global Food and Beverage Industry
農業食品部門におけるイノベーション主導の持続可能性：世界の食品・飲料産業からのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)
Alessandro Bernardo, Domizia Vescovo, Riccardo Censi, Roberto Ruggieri, Donatella Restuccia, Paola Campana
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は、農業食品部門における環境イノベーションとESGスコアの関係を調査した。633社のパネルデータ分析により、環境イノベーションはESGスコアを向上させるが、グリーン収益だけでは不十分であることが判明。投資家は開示ではなく、R&Dや業務効率などの具体的なイノベーションを評価する。ポリシーメーカーは表面的なグリーンラベリングではなく、構造的なR&Dとエコイノベーション能力を優先すべきである。
English
This study examines the relationship between environmental innovation and ESG scores in the global agri-food sector using panel data from 633 firms (2013-2023). It finds that environmental innovation enhances ESG scores, but green revenues alone do not guarantee higher ratings. Investors value tangible innovation inputs like R&D and operational efficiency over formal ESG disclosure. Policymakers should prioritize structural R&D and eco-innovation capabilities over superficial green labeling.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
この論文は、ESGスコアと実際のイノベーションの乖離を指摘しており、日本の企業が開示偏重ではなく、実質的な環境イノベーションに注力する必要性を示唆している。特に、サステナビリティ報告が義務化されつつある日本において、投資家が求める「実質」を理解する上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global 'substance over symbol' debate in ESG, showing that investors reward innovation inputs rather than disclosure scores. For global markets like the EU and US, it suggests that disclosure frameworks (e.g., CSRD, SEC) should not become ends in themselves but should incentivize genuine innovation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the gap between product-level green metrics and systemic innovation integration in ESG assessment.
🏢実務担当者:Companies should focus on R&D and operational efficiency to improve market valuation, not just ESG report scores.
🏛政策担当者:Policy incentives should target structural innovation capabilities rather than superficial green labeling.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT The agri‐food sector is vital to economic development, but it exerts significant environmental and social pressures. This study draws on the natural resource‐based view. It investigates the strategic sustainability‐performance nexus in the global food and beverage industry using a longitudinal dataset (2013–2023) of 633 firms across the EU, the United States, and China. The multivariate analysis provides novel evidence on the “substance over symbol” debate, revealing a critical dichotomy: While environmental innovation acts as a dynamic capability enhancing ESG scores, green revenues alone do not guarantee superior ratings, exposing a gap between product‐level metrics and systemic integration. Empirical findings indicate that financial markets value tangible innovation inputs, specifically R&D and operational efficiency, but do not directly reward ESG scores. This suggests investors prioritize innovation substance over formal disclosure. These findings underscore the need for a strategic shift from mere reporting compliance towards innovation‐led sustainability to enhance market value. For policymakers, the results indicate that incentives should prioritize structural R&D and eco‐innovation capabilities rather than superficial green labelling to align competitiveness with environmental objectives more effectively.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70736first seen 2026-05-14 22:31:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。