gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Adaptive Arbitration Framework for Cross-Border ESG Dispute Resolution

国境を越えたESG紛争解決のための適応的仲裁枠組み (AI 翻訳)

Zaini Munawir S, Taufik Siregar

Jurnal Akta📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-03-03#ESG
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.51338
原典: https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v13i1.51338

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、国境を越えたESG紛争における仲裁の有効性を分析し、ODR、ブロックチェーン、AIなどの技術革新が手続き効率と透明性を高めることを示す。適応的仲裁枠組みを提案し、倫理基準と技術統合の重要性を強調する。

English

This study analyzes the effectiveness of arbitration for cross-border ESG disputes, showing that digital technologies like ODR, blockchain, and AI enhance procedural efficiency and transparency. It proposes an adaptive arbitration framework integrating ethical standards and technological innovation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の企業や法務実務にとって、海外ESG紛争の仲裁手続きにおける技術活用の可能性を示す参考資料となるが、国内制度との直接的な関連は限定的。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX discourse by examining how arbitration can accommodate ESG disputes, highlighting the role of technology in improving transparency and enforcement, relevant for international investment and trade contexts.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Offers a conceptual framework for analyzing ESG dispute resolution mechanisms and technology integration.

🏢実務担当者:Provides guidance on leveraging arbitration clauses and digital tools for cross-border ESG conflicts.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights need for harmonization of ESG arbitration standards and enforcement across jurisdictions.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The resolution of cross-border disputes involving Environmental, Social, and This study examines the effectiveness of arbitration as an adaptive mechanism for resolving cross-border disputes involving Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues. The increasing integration of sustainability standards, human rights principles, and corporate governance obligations into international trade and investment relationships has generated complex disputes that require flexible yet legally certain resolution mechanisms. This research aims to analyze how arbitration accommodates ESG-related conflicts and to assess the contribution of technological innovation in strengthening procedural efficiency and transparency. The study employed a qualitative normative approach using descriptive-analytical methods based on secondary data, including arbitral awards, bilateral and multilateral treaty frameworks, institutional reports, and recent scholarly literature. The findings demonstrate that arbitration provides procedural flexibility, neutrality, enforceability, and expert-based adjudication capable of addressing technical ESG dimensions. Furthermore, the incorporation of digital technologies such as Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), blockchain-based evidence management, and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted document analysis enhances efficiency, transparency, and cross-border accessibility. However, challenges remain regarding enforcement inconsistencies, public policy limitations, and harmonization gaps among national legal systems. This research contributes by proposing an adaptive arbitration framework that integrates ethical standards, technological innovation, and ESG-sensitive interpretative approaches to ensure sustainability-oriented dispute resolution in the global legal order.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。