gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

From policy to practice – a systematic review of ESG integration in Malaysia’s higher education sector for strategic sustainability transformation

政策から実践へ―マレーシアの高等教育セクターにおけるESG統合の体系的レビュー:戦略的サステナビリティ変革に向けて (AI 翻訳)

Khartic Rao Manokaran, S. Ramakrishnan, Choi Sang Long, L. Indiran

Asian Education and Development Studies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-02-11#ESG
DOI: 10.1108/aeds-07-2025-0358
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-07-2025-0358

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は2020~2025年の26の査読付き研究を体系的にレビューし、マレーシアの高等教育機関におけるESG原則の統合状況を5つのテーマ(政策・組織コミットメント、カリキュラム、キャンパス運営、ステークホルダーエンゲージメント、ガバナンス・報告)で分析。実施の不整合、理論的基盤の不足、国家的基準の欠如など課題を明らかにし、文脈に適応したESG統合を提言する。

English

This systematic literature review of 26 peer-reviewed studies (2020–2025) critically examines ESG integration in Malaysian higher education across five thematic domains: policy and institutional commitment, curriculum, campus operations, stakeholder engagement, and governance/reporting. It finds inconsistent implementation, weak theoretical foundations, and absence of national standards, advocating for context-adaptive ESG strategies to support sustainability transformation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の大学におけるESG統合やサステナビリティ教育の参考となる可能性があるが、マレーシア特有の政策・文化背景に依存しており、直接の適用には慎重な検討が必要。日本のGX文脈では、SSBJや有報での開示強化が進む中、教育機関の役割を再考する契機となりうる。

In the global GX context

This study contributes to the global discourse on ESG integration in higher education by providing a structured thematic synthesis from a developing country perspective. It highlights the gap between policy intent and institutional practice, offering insights for institutions worldwide aiming to align with sustainability frameworks such as the UN SDGs and TCFD/ISSB disclosure trends.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:ESGと高等教育の接点を理論的に整理したフレームワークは、今後の比較研究や国際調査の基盤となりうる。

🏢実務担当者:大学のサステナビリティ担当者は、カリキュラム・運営・報告の各領域における実践的な課題と改善策を得られる。

🏛政策担当者:教育政策担当者は、ESGの国家的基準策定や大学への統合促進における課題と方向性を理解できる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

The increasing worldwide focus on environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles has compelled higher education institutions (HEIs) to re-evaluate their strategic responsibilities in promoting sustainable development. In Malaysia, the shift from ESG policy frameworks to institutional implementation is uneven and fragmented. This systematic literature review (SLR) consolidates 26 peer-reviewed studies published from 2020 to 2025 to critically analyse the integration of ESG principles by Malaysian higher education institutions across five thematic domains – policy and institutional commitment, curriculum integration, campus operations, stakeholder engagement and governance and reporting. Results indicate that while institutional knowledge of ESG has grown, its implementation often suffers from inconsistency, insufficient theoretical foundation and a lack of national standards. Principal issues include restricted curricular integration, variable environmental practices, superficial stakeholder engagement and disjointed reporting systems. The assessment reveals considerable demographic deficiencies, notably the underrepresentation of private and rural colleges and underscores the lack of customized ESG guidelines for the Malaysian higher education sector. This paper advocates for strategic, theory-based and contextually adaptable ESG integration to facilitate Malaysia’s comprehensive sustainable transition. By integrating national educational reforms with ESG principles, higher education institutions may act as catalysts for systemic and inclusive sustainability progress. This report provides practical insights for politicians, educators and institutional leaders aiming to close the gap between policy and practice in ESG adoption. This study is the first SLR to critically examine the integration of ESG principles within Malaysia’s higher education sector through a structured thematic synthesis of 26 peer-reviewed publications from 2020 to 2025. Unlike previous works that focus narrowly on sustainability education or isolated campus initiatives, this review holistically maps ESG practices across five core domains – policy, curriculum, operations, stakeholder engagement and reporting – while uncovering theoretical, practical and population-level gaps. By focusing specifically on the Malaysian context, the study provides region-specific insights that are often underrepresented in global ESG discourse. The originality of this paper lies in its framework-driven synthesis and cross-theme evaluation, which collectively offer actionable recommendations for institutional leaders, policymakers and academics aiming to bridge the policy–practice divide in ESG adoption. The value of this work extends beyond scholarly contribution; it provides a strategic lens to support Malaysia’s higher education institutions in aligning with national sustainability goals and global benchmarks such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。