CSRD指令の実施下におけるサステナビリティ報告のナラティブ構成要素の役割の変容
Transformation of the Role of the Narrative Component of Sustainability Reporting under the Implementation of the CSRD Directive (原題)
O.S. Fedorova
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、CSRD指令とESRS基準の実施下で、サステナビリティ報告におけるナラティブ要素の役割が、補助的な記述から戦略分析や印象管理の手段へと変容したことを分析する。ナラティブターン概念に基づき、報告が企業ストーリーテリング化し、グリーンウォッシングのリスクが生じることを指摘。EU指令2022/2464とESRS 1の内容分析により開示義務の程度を体系化し、バイエル社の2024年報告書を事例に、二重重要性与「セーフガード条項」の実践を示す。
English
This paper analyzes how the role of narrative in sustainability reporting transforms under the CSRD and ESRS, shifting from auxiliary description to strategic analysis and impression management. It highlights risks of greenwashing and systematizes disclosure obligation levels via content analysis of EU Directive 2022/2464 and ESRS 1, illustrated by Bayer AG's 2024 report. It emphasizes double materiality and the safeguard clause, and argues for adopting European approaches in Ukraine's reporting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準の適用が進む中、ナラティブ開示の質とグリーンウォッシング防止は重要な論点。本論文の二重重要性与ナラティブの役割分析は、日本の有報・統合報告書における記述情報の質向上に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global discourse on CSRD implementation, particularly the role of narrative in sustainability reports and greenwashing risks. It offers a framework for analyzing disclosure obligation levels and the safeguard clause, relevant for companies and regulators navigating the transition to ESRS.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic analysis of narrative roles and greenwashing risks under CSRD, useful for disclosure research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a three-level framework for structuring sustainability reports and insights on double materiality and safeguard clause.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for critical perception of narratives and potential regulatory implications for preventing greenwashing.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The article examines the transformation of the role of the narrative component of sustainability reporting under the implementation of the CSRD Directive and the ESRS standards, revealing its functional transition from an auxiliary descriptive element to an instrument of strategic analysis and impression management. The theoretical foundations of the study are grounded in the concept of the «narrative turn» in corporate reporting theory, which has shifted the emphasis from the objective transmission of economic, environmental, and social impacts to the construction of corporate reality through linguistic and visual means of communication. It is established that the narrative turn has transformed sustainability reporting into a form of corporate storytelling, while simultaneously giving rise to risks of using narrative elements as a tool of impression management and greenwashing, which actualizes the need for their critical perception. Based on a content analysis of EU Directive 2022/2464 and the ESRS 1 standard, the terminological apparatus determining the degree of obligation of information disclosure («shall disclose,» «may disclose,» «shall consider») is systematized, and its practical implementation is illustrated through a case study of the «Bayer AG» concern's sustainability report for 2024. It is demonstrated that a quality sustainability report is formed as a three-level system combining standardized comparable metrics, reputational narratives that reflect a company's strategic uniqueness, and methodological justifications of managerial decisions. Particular attention is paid to the principle of double materiality, which has substantially expanded the scope of narrative disclosures, obliging enterprises to describe due diligence processes across the entire value chain, as well as to the «safeguard clause» mechanism, under which a quality narrative may temporarily substitute for missing quantitative data during the transition period. The strategic necessity of implementing European approaches to narrative information disclosure into the practice of Ukrainian sustainability reporting is substantiated in the context of Ukraine's European integration processes, its EU candidate status, and the need to preserve access to the European market and international financing.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.26642/ppa-2026-1(13)-67-74first seen 2026-08-30 05:31:43 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:20:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。