← 論文一覧に戻る

ESG採用と企業財務パフォーマンス

ESG Adoption and Corporate Financial Performance (原題)

Tatheer Fatima, M. Hafeez, Haris Rehman, Khadija Yasen

Journal of Business Insight and Innovation📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-20#ESG経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.63544/jbii.v5i10.258
原典: https://doi.org/10.63544/jbii.v5i10.258
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

パキスタン証券取引所上場20社・7セクターを対象に、ESG採用前後3年の準実験的デザインで因果関係を検証した研究。ROA・ROE・利益率への直接効果は統計的に有意でなく、企業規模の調整効果も確認されなかった。一方セクター別ではセメントが正、IT・医薬品が負と有意に分かれ、画一的なESG規制ではなくセクター別設計の必要性を示唆する。

English

A pre-post quasi-experimental study of 20 PSX-listed firms across seven sectors tests the causal effect of ESG adoption on financial performance. It finds no significant direct effect on ROA, ROE, or profit margin, and no moderating role of firm size. Sector results diverge sharply—positive for cement, negative for IT and pharmaceuticals—arguing against uniform ESG regulation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

SSBJ基準・有報開示が進む日本では、ESG対応を短期的財務リターンではなくステークホルダー・環境根拠で正当化すべきという主張は、統合報告書や投資家対話の設計に示唆を与える。セクター別の効果差は業種横断の一律開示枠組みを検討する日本企業にも参考になる。

In the global GX context

Amid ISSB/CSRD-driven global disclosure mandates, this paper cautions that ESG adoption does not reliably translate into short-term financial gain, supporting a stakeholder-based rather than returns-based justification. Its sector-heterogeneity finding challenges one-size-fits-all ESG regulation and informs transition-finance and disclosure-policy debates in emerging markets.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:因果デザインでESG・財務の相関研究の限界を補う実証例として、セクター別異質性の理論的説明を探る出発点になる。

🏢実務担当者:ESG対応の投資対効果を短期的財務指標だけで説明せず、セクター特性に応じた開示・説明責任の組み立てに使える。

🏛政策担当者:ESG規制を一律に課さず、セクター別に設計し、財務便益以外の根拠で正当化する際の論拠を提供する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

A debate on the correlation between ESG adoption and financial performance of firms still exists in the frontier markets, as previous Pakistani studies have used correlational designs which do not allow for causal relationships. I filled this gap by testing, using a pre-post quasi-experimental design, the causal relationship between ESG and financial performance, whether firm size moderates this relationship, and whether the effect is sector specific. The sample comprises 20 companies listed on the PSX across seven sectors, providing a total of 120 firm year observations over three years pre and three years post ESG adoption, analyzed using firm fixed effects panel regression and complementary statistical tests. The results demonstrate that there is no statistically significant direct effect of ESG adoption on the variables ROA, ROE and PM and no significant moderating effect of firm size. On the sectoral level, there is a strong positive significance for Cement, and a strong negative significance for IT & Technology and Pharmaceuticals, a pattern that is surprising from a theoretical perspective. The results indicate that policymakers should justify ESG based guidelines on the grounds of stakeholder and environment instead of short-term financial gains and should not have a uniform policy for ESG regulation across different sectors. References Abdi, Y., Li, X., & Câmara-Turull, X. (2022). Exploring the impact of sustainability (ESG) disclosure on firm value and financial performance (FP) in airline industry: The moderating role of size and age. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 5052–5079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01649-w Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), Article 1900500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1900500 Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108 Azam, I., Guo, Y., & Lau, C. K. M. (2026). Green finance and ESG readiness: Bridging the gaps in sustainability transitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(1), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2825 Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 17–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 Biju, A. (2025). ESG-firm performance nexus: Evidence from an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4152 Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911963 Chaudhary, A. A., & Riaz, A. (2025). The nexus between ESG and corporate performance: Evidence from Pakistan. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 2971–2988. Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y., & Young, J. (2023). ESG performance and corporate value: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 15(1), Article 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010764 Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1951). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression II. Biometrika, 38(1–2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159 Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Fu, C., Lu, L., & Pirabi, M. (2023). Advancing green finance: A review of sustainable development. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-023-00020-3 Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multilevel perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827 Hidayat, I., Bailusy, M. N., & Rusandry, R. (2026). The effect of green finance and leverage on company value with profitability as a mediating variable. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 7(1), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1364 Indriyani, E., Alam, S., & Munir, A. R. (2026). Mapping ESG, green finance, and sustainable financial performance research: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 16(1), 312–328. Lee, J. W. (2020). Green finance and sustainable development goals: The case of China. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.577 Liu, J., Zhu, B., Zhang, B., & Yang, A. (2026). The impact of China’s green finance policy on corporate ESG performance: Evidence from Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone. Sustainability, 18(3), Article 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031390 Ma, L., & Zhuo, S. (2026). Environmental regulation and green innovation: The moderating roles of green finance and executive green perception. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 14, Article 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.100954 Nazir, S. S., Ashiq, T., Chishti, M. F., Ullah, R., & Marwat, A. (2024). Assessing financial stability through ESG: The impact of sustainable finance on commercial banks listed in Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(3), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00455 Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, Article 136859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136859 Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 Shobhwani, K., & Lodha, S. (2023). Impact of ESG risk scores on firm performance: An empirical analysis of NSE-100 companies. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X231170910 Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 Subagiya, S., Dhyta, M., Amri, A., & Hadi, S. (2026). Green finance and its role in promoting sustainable investment in emerging markets. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 6(2), 233–244. Sun, Z., Cai, C., Tan, H., Ji, H., & Tian, G. L. (2025). Corporate ESG performance and competitive strategies from the perspective of financial markets: Strategic significance of firm size. Finance Research Letters, 77, Article 107080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107080 Wilson, B., Shallangwa, G. M., & Mela, S. L. (2026). Does ESG financing stimulate green innovation and productivity growth in the UK? A quantitative analysis of UK firms (2015–2024). World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 29(1), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0178 Yu, J., Long, H., & Shahzad, I. (2026). Driving sustainable development in BRICS through green finance and economic growth: A quantile regression perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 11, Article 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100879

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。