Integrating ESG in Corporate Restructuring: Comparative Legal Frameworks of Indonesia and Singapore
企業再編におけるESG統合：インドネシアとシンガポールの比較法的枠組み (AI 翻訳)
Sheilla Bintang Aerielisty
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドネシアとシンガポールの企業再編におけるESG基準の統合を比較分析。インドネシアの断片的な規制体制と量のみの合併審査はグリーンウォッシュを招き、シンガポールの制度的管理と判例解釈がリスクを軽減することを示す。結論として、インドネシアにはESGデューデリジェンス義務化と予備的なグリーン独禁審査が必要と提言。
English
This paper compares ESG integration in corporate restructuring in Indonesia and Singapore. It finds that Indonesia's fragmented regulations and purely quantitative merger control facilitate greenwashing, while Singapore's institutionalized compliance mitigates risks. It recommends mandatory ESG due diligence and preliminary green antitrust evaluation for Indonesia.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJや有報でのESG開示が進むが、企業再編時のデューデリジェンス枠組みは未整備。本稿の比較分析は日本法への示唆となる可能性がある。
In the global GX context
Globally, ESG due diligence in M&A is gaining traction. This comparative analysis of Indonesia and Singapore offers insights for jurisdictions like Japan and others seeking to align corporate restructuring with sustainability goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Comparative legal scholars can use this analysis as a model for evaluating ESG integration in corporate law across jurisdictions.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate lawyers and M&A advisors will find actionable insights on legal risks and best practices for ESG due diligence in cross-border transactions.
🏛政策担当者:Regulators considering ESG mandates for corporate restructuring can learn from the contrast between Indonesia's fragmentation and Singapore's integrated approach.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article comparatively analyzes the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards within corporate restructuring frameworks in Indonesia and Singapore. Driven by the global transition towards stakeholder capitalism, this study investigates how structural disparities in positive law and fiduciary duty doctrines dictate legal due diligence in mergers and acquisitions. Utilizing a comparative doctrinal methodology, the analysis applies stakeholder and legitimacy theories to evaluate the Indonesian Company Law and antitrust regulations against Singapore's mandatory reporting regime. The findings demonstrate that Indonesia's fragmented regulatory architecture and purely quantitative merger control mechanisms facilitate impression management, exposing acquiring entities to severe extraterritorial liabilities. Conversely, Singapore effectively mitigates these risks through institutionalized compliance and dynamic judicial interpretation. The research concludes that amending Indonesia's corporate law to mandate ESG due diligence and instituting a preliminary green antitrust evaluation are imperative to prevent greenwashing and ensure legal certainty in sustainable transnational business consolidation and corporate transactions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.65101/nusantara.v1i3.382first seen 2026-06-04 05:12:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。