From ESG Compliance to Agribusiness Resilience: Stakeholder Trust and Sustainability Performance in Nigeria and Brazil
ESGコンプライアンスからアグリビジネスのレジリエンスへ:ナイジェリアとブラジルにおけるステークホルダーの信頼と持続可能性パフォーマンス (AI 翻訳)
Kingsley Chibuzo Ozike, Ikugbe Eldred Ebunu, M. S. Kamara, Sobechukwu Micah Ifemeje, Joshua Olugbenga Arowobusoye
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ナイジェリアとブラジルのアグリビジネスを対象に、ESGコンプライアンスがステークホルダーの信頼と持続可能性パフォーマンスを通じてレジリエンスに貢献するメカニズムを比較分析する。リソース・ベースド・ビュー、ステークホルダー理論、制度理論を統合したフレームワークを提案し、ブラジルでは循環経済との連携、ナイジェリアでは信頼回復と制度強化が重要であると示唆する。
English
This paper comparatively analyzes how ESG compliance contributes to agribusiness resilience through stakeholder trust and sustainability performance in Nigeria and Brazil. Integrating Resource-Based View, Stakeholder Theory, and Institutional Theory, it proposes an ESG-trust-performance-resilience framework, finding that Brazil links ESG to circular economy while Nigeria relies on trust restoration and institutional strengthening.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業がナイジェリアやブラジルでアグリビジネスを展開する場合、ESG対応が現地の信頼構築やレジリエンスにどう影響するかを示唆する。ただし、日本のGX政策やSSBJとの直接的な関連性は低い。
In the global GX context
This study offers insights for global agribusiness firms and investors on moving ESG beyond compliance to resilience, particularly in emerging economies. It aligns with global GX trends emphasizing stakeholder trust and sustainability performance, but does not directly address TCFD/ISSB frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides an integrated framework combining RBV, stakeholder, and institutional theories for understanding ESG-resilience links in agribusiness.
🏢実務担当者:Offers practical implications for agribusiness firms and cooperatives in emerging economies to build resilience through credible ESG practices.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for enabling institutional conditions to support ESG-driven agribusiness resilience in Nigeria and Brazil.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance is becoming increasingly important in agribusiness because the sector faces growing pressure from climate risks, food security concerns, sustainability disclosure requirements, stakeholder accountability, and value-chain disruptions. However, ESG is still often treated merely as a reporting obligation rather than as a strategic pathway for strengthening agribusiness resilience. This study develops a comparative conceptual–empirical synthesis to explain how ESG compliance may contribute to agribusiness resilience through stakeholder trust and sustainability performance in Nigeria and Brazil. Drawing on verified secondary literature, previous empirical studies, and institutional analysis, the study integrates the Resource-Based View, Stakeholder Theory, and Institutional Theory. The paper argues that ESG compliance becomes relevant to resilience when it is translated into credible governance practices, trusted by stakeholders, reflected in sustainability performance, and supported by enabling institutional conditions. Brazil illustrates a pathway in which ESG is increasingly linked to circular economy practices, stakeholder collaboration, corporate reputation, sustainability orientation, and agribusiness resilience. Nigeria illustrates a pathway in which ESG relevance depends largely on trust restoration, disclosure credibility, cooperative governance, risk management, and institutional strengthening. The study contributes to management and agribusiness scholarship by proposing an ESG–trust–performance–resilience framework for agribusiness systems in emerging economies. It also provides practical and policy implications for agribusiness firms, cooperatives, regulators, investors, and sustainability stakeholders seeking to move ESG beyond compliance toward credible resilience building.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.66694/siar.gjmbr20262002first seen 2026-05-31 04:51:37 · last seen 2026-06-03 05:16:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。