Mobilizing Green Investments and PPP Governance in the Energy Transition: Regulatory Challenges and Prospects for Morocco
エネルギー移行におけるグリーン投資とPPPガバナンスの動員：モロッコの規制上の課題と展望 (AI 翻訳)
null Mohammed Boulghalagh, null Hiba Berrahal, null Btissame Essafi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エネルギー移行におけるグリーン投資動員の規制・制度的課題を分析。サステナビリティタクソノミーの断片化、非財務情報開示基準の多様性、グリーン資産の健全性処理の不確実性、炭素市場のガバナンス制約などをEU・米国・中国・モロッコの比較を通じて検討。規制の収斂、透明性向上、市場の完全性、手続き改革がグリーン資本コスト低減に不可欠と結論づけ、新興国の持続可能な金融への統合を提言する。
English
This paper analyzes regulatory and institutional challenges in mobilizing green investments for the energy transition, comparing frameworks in the EU, US, China, and Morocco. It examines fragmentation of sustainability taxonomies, diversity of non-financial disclosure standards, prudential treatment uncertainty for green assets, and carbon market governance limitations. The study concludes that regulatory convergence, transparency, market integrity, and procedural reforms are essential to lower green capital costs and accelerate the transition, offering recommendations for integrating emerging economies into sustainable finance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJや有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む中、タクソノミーや開示基準の国際比較は、日本の制度設計や国際調和の方向性を検討する上で参考になる。特に、新興国との比較は、日本のアジア地域でのGX協力に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comparative analysis of regulatory fragmentation across major economies, relevant to global efforts toward ISSB and TCFD convergence. Its focus on emerging economies like Morocco offers insights for transition finance and inclusive global frameworks, though Japan-specific content is absent.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of regulatory frameworks across EU, US, China, and Morocco, useful for scholars studying sustainable finance governance.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights key regulatory uncertainties and procedural bottlenecks that affect green investment decisions, relevant for corporate strategy teams.
🏛政策担当者:Offers strategic recommendations for regulatory convergence and inclusion of emerging economies, valuable for policy design in sustainable finance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The global energy transition demands a massive and urgent reallocation of capital toward low-carbon assets, crucial for achieving international climate objectives. However, mobilizing green investments unfolds within a landscape marked by multiple regulatory and institutional challenges. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the fragmentation of sustainability taxonomies, the diversity and heterogeneity of non-financial disclosure standards, and the persistent uncertainty regarding the prudential treatment of green assets. Additionally, the study highlights structural governance limitations in carbon markets, alongside non-financial constraints such as lengthy administrative permitting procedures and infrastructure bottlenecks. By comparing regulatory frameworks across the European Union, the United States, China, and Morocco, the research emphasizes that regulatory convergence, enhanced transparency, market integrity, and effective procedural reforms are essential conditions for lowering the cost of green capital and accelerating the energy transition. Lastly, the article offers strategic recommendations aimed at strengthening overall regulatory coherence and encouraging the integration of emerging economies into sustainable finance, thereby contributing to a more inclusive and effective global mechanism. Keywords: Global energy transition, green finance, sustainability taxonomies, non-financial disclosure, carbon markets, regulatory convergence, emerging economies. Received Date: July 19, 2024 Accepted Date: August 11, 2024 Published Date: August 30, 2024 Available Online at https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/408
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.63883/ijsrisjournal.v4i4.408first seen 2026-05-05 19:07:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。