Institutionally conditioned green bond architecture: A framework for cotton processing in Uzbekistan
制度的に条件付けられたグリーンボンドのアーキテクチャ：ウズベキスタンの綿花加工のための枠組み (AI 翻訳)
Khaydarov NK
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ウズベキスタンの綿花加工セクター向けグリーンボンドの概念モデル（ICGBA）を提案。AHPとBWMを用いて適格支出カテゴリの優先順位付け（水効率0.42、省エネ・再エネ0.37、認証0.21）を行い、3シナリオモデルで水・エネルギー・CO2・輸出への効果を定量化。商業資金ではNPVマイナスだが、グラント50％・利下げ融資50％のブレンド型で投資が成立（NPV+53万ドル、IRR9.0％、回収6.4年）。
English
This paper develops the ICGBA conceptual model for green bonds in Uzbekistan's cotton processing. Using AHP/BWM, it prioritizes eligible expenditure categories (water efficiency 0.42, energy efficiency/renewables 0.37, certification 0.21) and models three scenarios. A blended finance structure (50% grant, 50% concessional debt at 4%) makes investments viable (NPV +$0.53M, IRR 9.0%, payback 6.4 years), while commercial rates yield negative NPV.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業が中央アジアでグリーンボンドを活用する際の参考事例。特に、制度的キャパシティと規制移植の重要性を指摘。日本でも途上国向けグリーンファイナンスの設計に応用可能。
In the global GX context
The ICGBA framework offers a replicable model for green bond design in emerging markets, emphasizing institutional capacity and regulatory transplantation. For global practitioners, it demonstrates how blended finance can unlock capital-intensive green investments in commodity supply chains.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The ICGBA model and AHP/BWM integration for green bond eligibility weighting.
🏢実務担当者:Blended finance structures for cotton processing green investments, with quantifiable payback and thresholds.
🏛政策担当者:Need for institutional capacity building and concessional finance to enable green bonds in developing economies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
<title>Abstract</title> <p> Uzbekistan's five thematic bond issuances since 2021 demonstrate market access but have not financed the water- and energy-intensive processing stage of the country's 134-cluster cotton-textile system. This paper develops a generalisable conceptual model — Institutionally Conditioned Green Bond Architecture (ICGBA) — formalising how sector-specific green finance instruments must be jointly conditioned on a country's institutional-capacity track, its regulatory-transplantation track, and the verification rigour needed to avoid a conditional finance-intensity paradox identified in a companion analysis. We prioritise three proposed eligible-use-of-proceeds categories using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), cross-validated against the independent Best-Worst Method (Pearson r = 0.996); the resulting weights (water efficiency/effluent treatment: 0.42; energy efficiency/renewables: 0.37; certification/traceability: 0.21) are internally consistent (consistency ratio < 0.01). We build a three-scenario model quantifying illustrative water, energy, CO2, and export effects, and conduct a cost-benefit analysis of a representative cluster-level investment: commercial-rate financing yields a negative net present value (NPV = –USD 2.08 million; IRR = − 4.3%), while a blended concessional structure (50% grant, 50% concessional debt at 4%) renders the investment viable (NPV = + USD 0.53 million; IRR = 9.0%; payback 6.4 years), robust across a range of tariff assumptions tested in sensitivity analysis. We do not claim expert-panel validation of the proposed framework: a two-round Delphi protocol is fully specified but not yet fielded, and we report this gap transparently. Facility-level Uzbekistan ginning-cluster engineering data, sought but not found in the public domain, is substituted with a documented general textile-processing benchmark pending a dedicated engineering audit. <bold>JEL Classification:</bold> Q56, G23, O16, Q17, C44 </p>
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10482157/v1first seen 2026-07-30 04:55:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。