← 論文一覧に戻る

Retreat of European Mandatory Sustainability Reporting: What Value Remains for Companies Removed from the CSRD’s Scope?

欧州の義務的サステナビリティ報告の後退:CSRDの適用範囲から外れた企業に残る価値とは (AI 翻訳)

Jørgen Kjøsen Lindgren

Journal of Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-05#開示インフラOrigin: EU対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.55845/jos-2026-22285
原典: https://doi.org/10.55845/jos-2026-22285
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本稿は、CSRDの適用範囲が約90%縮小された後も、対象外となった企業がステークホルダーからの情報要求に直面し続けると論じる。ESRSに基づくダブルマテリアリティ評価は内部のサステナビリティ経営に有用であり、報告は規制負担ではなく経営ツールと捉えるべきだと主張する。

English

This perspective argues that companies removed from the CSRD's scope will still face stakeholder demand for sustainability information. Reporting under ESRS, especially double materiality, supports internal sustainability management, so reporting should be seen as a management tool, not just a regulatory burden.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示が任意適用から始まり、CSRDの後退は「義務化の限界」を示す事例として参考になる。日本企業は自主的な開示の価値を再確認し、ESRSのダブルマテリアリティを経営管理に活用する示唆を得られる。

In the global GX context

The CSRD's scope reduction is a pivotal moment for global disclosure regimes. This paper offers a counter-narrative to deregulation, emphasizing that stakeholder pressure and internal management benefits sustain reporting value, relevant for ISSB and SEC rulemaking debates.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework for understanding the value of sustainability reporting beyond regulatory compliance.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights how double materiality and ESRS reporting can serve as internal management tools even when not mandatory.

🏛政策担当者:Informs policy design by showing that stakeholder demand and management benefits may justify voluntary or scaled-back reporting regimes.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) represents one of the most ambitious attempts to mandate and standardize sustainability reporting globally (Directive (EU) 2022/2464, 2022). The directive envisioned a phased implementation, beginning with large public-interest entities reporting in 2025 and gradually including additional companies. However, during the first year of reporting, the European Commission introduced an Omnibus simplification package, reducing the CSRD’s scope by approximately 90%. Consequently, many companies that have already reported or prepared will no longer be subject to the requirements. This perspective argues that such companies will continue to face demand for sustainability information from key external stakeholders. Additionally, reporting under the accompanying European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), particularly through double materiality assessments and different disclosure requirements, can support sustainability performance management internally. Sustainability reporting should therefore not only be viewed as a regulatory burden but also as a management tool for navigating an increasingly uncertain future.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。