Replication data for: Integrating ethics and sustainability into institutional quality assurance: A conceptual and methodological framework
高等教育の質保証への倫理と持続可能性の統合：概念的・方法論的枠組みのための再現データ (AI 翻訳)
Olga Masot, Santi Cots, Elena Paraíso Pueyo, Judith Roca, Ana Lavedán, Rosa Mar Alzuria‐Alós
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、高等教育の機関認定に倫理と持続可能性を体系的に統合するための概念的・方法論的枠組みを開発した。AQU Catalunyaの認定枠組みを国際モデルと比較し、欧州高等教育圏の基準に沿った提案を提示。自己評価ルーブリックや指標マッピングなどのデータを含む。
English
This study develops a conceptual and methodological framework for integrating ethics and sustainability into higher education accreditation. It compares AQU Catalunya's framework with international models and proposes a context-sensitive approach aligned with European standards. The dataset includes rubrics, indicator mappings, and traceability matrices.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の大学評価・認証評価制度において、SDGsやサステナビリティの組み込みが進む中、本枠組みは参考になり得る。ただし、企業のGX開示やSSBJとは直接関係せず、教育機関向けの内容。
In the global GX context
This framework contributes to global discussions on integrating sustainability into quality assurance in higher education, complementing trends in ESG reporting and institutional accountability. It offers a structured approach for accreditation agencies and policymakers.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:高等教育におけるサステナビリティ統合の評価枠組みの設計方法を学ぶことができる。
🏢実務担当者:大学や認定機関の担当者が、倫理・持続可能性の評価指標を導入する際の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:教育政策担当者は、認定基準にサステナビリティを組み込む際の国際比較と方法論を参照できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This dataset supports a study aimed at developing a conceptual and methodological framework for the systemic integration of ethics and sustainability into institutional accreditation in higher education. The data were generated through a three-stage conceptual design: a critical review of theoretical foundations and international benchmarks, a comparative analysis of AQU Catalunya's institutional accreditation framework against selected international accreditation models, and the development of a context-sensitive proposal aligned with the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). The dataset includes: (Table III) a multidimensional framework linking institutional dimensions, evidence, and indicators for ethics and sustainability assessment; (Table IV) a theory-based self-assessment rubric designed to evaluate the integration of ethics and sustainability within higher education institutional accreditation processes, developed as the principal outcome of the study; (Table A) an overview of the accreditation frameworks analysed and their treatment of ethics and sustainability; (Table B) a comparative analysis of evidence related to ethics and institutional sustainability across accreditation models; (Table C) a comparison of indicators used to assess ethics and sustainability in different accreditation systems; (Table D) a mapping of ethics and sustainability assessment criteria across institutional quality dimensions; and (Table E) a methodological traceability matrix linking source documents, theoretical foundations, and rubric construction. The materials provide a foundation for understanding how ethics, sustainability, institutional integrity, and emerging challenges such as AI ethics can be incorporated into institutional accreditation systems. They are intended to support accreditation agencies, policymakers, and higher education institutions in strengthening accountability, institutional integrity, and sustainable quality assurance practices
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.34810/DATA2669first seen 2026-08-02 05:41:54
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。