← 論文一覧に戻る

基準の収斂、結果の乖離?サステナビリティ報告における相互運用性の実証分析

Converging standards, diverging outcomes? An empirical analysis of interoperability in sustainability reporting (原題)

Matteo Augello, Elisabetta Mafrolla

Journal of Applied Accounting Research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-22#開示インフラOrigin: EU経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.1108/jaar-08-2025-0446
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-08-2025-0446

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

EUのCSRD/ESRS導入後のサステナビリティ報告を対象に、ESRSとGRI・IFRSの相互運用性をエネルギー企業の比較分析で検証した研究。ESRSとGRI準拠企業の開示は強く整合する一方、IFRS準拠企業は特にガバナンス領域で開示水準が低く異質であることを示す。相互運用性グリッドと指標を構築し、枠組み間整合を開示ベースで評価した初期の実証研究。

English

This study empirically assesses interoperability between ESRS, GRI, and IFRS among EU energy companies under CSRD. It finds strong alignment between ESRS and GRI disclosures, but significantly lower and more heterogeneous disclosure among IFRS-aligned firms, especially on governance. Using an interoperability grid and indicators, it offers early disclosure-based evidence on cross-framework alignment.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

SSBJ基準の国際規格との整合や、日本企業がGRI・IFRS両対応を迫られる局面に直接示唆を与える。EU規制下での枠組み間整合の実証は、日本での開示制度設計や有報・統合報告書対応の参考になる。

In the global GX context

Directly informs the ISSB–GRI–CSRD interoperability debate central to global disclosure harmonization. Its finding that investor-centric IFRS-aligned reporting lags on governance transparency is a key data point for standard setters and CSRD implementation scholarship.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:ESRS・GRI・IFRS間の相互運用性を開示データで測定する手法と実証結果を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:GRIとIFRSの両対応を進める際、ガバナンス開示のギャップに注意すべきことを示す。

🏛政策担当者:枠組み間整合の実効性と、投資家志向基準の透明性限界を制度設計に反映する材料となる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Purpose This article investigates the evolving sustainability reporting landscape in the European Union (EU) following the implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). It explores the degree of interoperability – that is, the effective alignment between the ESRS and major international frameworks, including the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the International Sustainability Reporting Standards (IFRS) – and evaluates how companies respond in practice. Design/methodology/approach The study conducts a comparative analysis of energy companies operating within the EU. The empirical analysis is supported by the construction of an interoperability grid and the subsequent measurement of interoperability indicators. Findings The analysis reveals strong alignment in disclosures between companies reporting under the ESRS and those reporting under the GRI, supporting the practical effectiveness of interoperability initiatives. In contrast, IFRS-aligned firms exhibit significantly lower and more heterogeneous disclosure levels, particularly in governance, highlighting limitations of investor-centric reporting frameworks in achieving comprehensive sustainability transparency. Research limitations/implications The findings are based on a cross-sectional sample from a single EU sector, limiting their generalisability. Nevertheless, the results inform policymakers and firms by evidencing practical interoperability between the ESRS and GRI while highlighting gaps in IFRS-aligned disclosures. Practical implications By empirically examining interoperability in practice, this study provides evidence-based insights for policymakers, standard setters, and firms, supporting alignment strategies and informing the implementation of sustainability reporting frameworks within the evolving EU regulatory landscape. Social implications Achieving a truly harmonised reporting environment across the EU would strengthen stakeholder trust, enhance the comparability of disclosures, and support effective and sustainable economic development. Originality/value This study provides empirical evidence on interoperability across the ESRS, GRI, and IFRS frameworks, offering one of the first disclosure-based assessments of cross-framework alignment in the early implementation phase of the CSRD.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。