組織レジリエンスの前提条件としてのESGリスク：環境・社会・コーポレートガバナンスの脅威に関する文献レビュー
Risiko ESG sebagai Prasyarat Ketahanan Organisasi: Kajian Pustaka atas Ancaman Lingkungan, Sosial, dan Tata Kelola Korporat (原題)
Zuwaibatul Aslamiyah, Nur Faizah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、ESGリスク（気候変動、労働者福祉、汚職）が組織のレジリエンスに与える影響を、ステークホルダー理論、ダイナミック・ケイパビリティ理論、正当性理論に基づき統合。環境リスクは操業安定性と資本コストに、社会リスクは業績と人材ロイヤルティに、ガバナンスリスクはエージェンシーコストとレピュテーションに影響することを示す。透明な開示と動的ケイパビリティが重要と結論。
English
This review integrates ESG risks (climate change, worker welfare, corruption) with organizational resilience using stakeholder, dynamic capability, and legitimacy theories. It finds environmental risk affects operational stability and cost of capital, social risk impacts performance and loyalty, and governance risk raises agency costs and reputational risk. Transparent disclosure and dynamic capabilities are key.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示義務化が迫る中、ESGリスクをレジリエンス向上の戦略的要素として捉える視点は、有報・統合報告書でのリスク開示や投資家対応に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review supports the integration of ESG risk into resilience frameworks, aligning with ISSB and CSRD disclosure requirements that emphasize risk management and resilience.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ESGリスクと組織レジリエンスの理論的統合の枠組みを提供。
🏢実務担当者:ESGリスク管理をレジリエンス戦略に組み込むための概念的基盤。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change, pressure on worker welfare, and corrupt practices remain three of the most frequent sources of risk that shake the continuity of business organizations, yet strategic management literature has not fully integrated these three dimensions into the concept of organizational resilience. This article develops a classic literature review of recent academic literature on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risk and its relationship to organizational capacity to withstand, adapt to, and recover from long-term pressure. The sources reviewed include internationally reputable journal articles published within the last ten years, with an emphasis on empirical studies based on listed-company data as well as the theoretical frameworks of stakeholder theory, the dynamic capability view, and legitimacy theory. The findings show that environmental risk in the form of physical and transition climate risk directly affects operational stability and firms’ cost of capital; social risk stemming from the neglect of worker welfare contributes to declining performance and human-resource loyalty; while weak governance and corrupt practices increase agency costs and reputational risk. All three dimensions are consistently associated with the level of organizational resilience when managed through transparent disclosure and firms’ dynamic capabilities, although the strength of this relationship is not uniform across geographic contexts. This article concludes that modern organizational resilience cannot be separated from the quality of ESG risk management, and offers a conceptual framework for researchers and practitioners to view ESG not merely as a compliance instrument, but as a long-term risk-mitigation strategy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://journal.aripafi.or.id/index.php/jbpai/article/download/2156/2168first seen 2026-08-23 05:27:25 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:16:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。