Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Supply Chain Finance Risks in Fashion Textile and Leather: ESG Integration and Application of AHP-FAHP Method
ファッション繊維・皮革におけるサプライチェーンファイナンスリスクの多次元評価：ESG統合とAHP-FAHP法の応用 (AI 翻訳)
Xuan Zhang, Zijing Wu, Qiang Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ファッション繊維・皮革産業のサプライチェーンファイナンスリスクにESG要因を統合し、AHP-FAHP法で分析。サプライチェーン俊敏性リスクが最大で、環境認証コストやソーシャルメディアのトレンド変動が主要リスク。全体として高リスク状態であり、デジタルツインやグリーンファイナンスなどの対策を提案。
English
This study integrates ESG factors into supply chain finance risk assessment for the fashion textile and leather industry using AHP-FAHP. Key risks include high environmental certification costs, social media trend volatility, and NFT valuation. The industry is high-risk, and the paper proposes tiered risk matrices and ESG-integrated pricing models.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のアパレル業界でもESG対応が進行中であり、本手法はサプライチェーンリスク評価にESGを統合する実践的な枠組みを提供。特に環境認証コストのリスクはScope3管理にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to integrating ESG into supply chain finance risk, relevant for the fashion industry's decarbonization. The AHP-FAHP method offers a quantitative approach to ESG risk assessment, applicable under CSRD disclosure requirements.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a multi-criteria decision analysis framework for ESG-integrated risk assessment in supply chains.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a tiered risk matrix and investment framework to manage ESG-related supply chain risks.
📄 Abstract（原文）
To address the risk challenges of supply chain finance in the sustainable transformation of the textile and leather industry, this study systematically integrates ESG factors into the risk assessment framework, uses the AHP-FAHP hybrid method to quantitatively analyze the financial risks of the fashion textile and leather supply chain, and highlights the unique intersection of fashion-specific risks, digital transformation, and ESG integration. Based on survey data from 18 interdisciplinary experts, the weight ranking of the four risk dimensions is identified: supply chain agility risk (41.54%) > market volatility risk (32.03%) > financial instrument risk (14.34%) > corporate credit risk (12.09%). Among them, the sharp increase in environmental material certification costs (risk score 4.61/5.0), the social media trend volatility of Xiaohongshu (4.28/5.0), and the valuation volatility of digital fashion NFT-based collateral (3.78/5.0) are the key risk points. The study shows that the textile and leather supply chain finance is generally in a high-risk state (3.56/5.0), and ESG compliance costs have become an unignorable industry-wide risk with systemic propagation effects in the fashion textile and leather supply chain. This study develops three actionable decision-making tools-1) a tiered risk assessment matrix for fashion SCF, 2) an agility risk mitigation investment framework, and 3) ESG-integrated pricing models-providing concrete recommendations including digital twinning adoption, nearshoring strategies, and green finance product innovation to balance sustainable development and risk control and highlights the unique intersection of fashionspecific risks, digital transformation, and ESG integration.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.31881/tlr.2026.4780first seen 2026-05-29 05:47:07 · last seen 2026-06-03 05:23:13
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。