持続可能な銀行研究の焦点：サブサハラ・アフリカにおけるグリーン融資とサステナビリティ報告に向けた制度的圧力と組織的準備態勢の計量書誌分析
Sustainable banking research in focus: a bibliometric analysis of institutional pressures and organizational readiness for green lending and sustainability reporting in Sub-Saharan Africa (原題)
Adama Fatty, Gugus Irianto, Eko Ganis Sukoharsono, Noval Adib
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
Scopus収録の1,890件（2000年1月〜2026年4月）をPRISMA 2020に沿って選定し、VOSviewerとBiblioshinyで計量書誌分析した。年平均成長率17.69%で拡大する一方、サブサハラ・アフリカは49カ国中7カ国・約7.2%にとどまり、組織的準備態勢の概念は知的核にほぼ不在。制度的圧力を前因、R=MC2準備態勢を媒介とする統合フレームワークを提唱し、形式的採用と実質的実施を区別する視座を与える。
English
A PRISMA-based bibliometric analysis of 1,890 Scopus documents (2000–2026) maps sustainable banking research using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny. It finds 17.69% compound annual growth driven by coercive and normative pressures, yet Sub-Saharan Africa contributes only ~7.2% (7 of 49 countries) and organizational readiness is nearly absent from the field's core. The authors propose an integrated framework linking institutional pressures to green lending and sustainability reporting via R=MC2 readiness capacities.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
SSBJ基準・有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む日本企業にとって、制度的圧力が形式的採用に留まり実質的実施に至らないリスクは示唆的。特にグローバル銀行のグリーン融資・開示要求がサプライチェーン経由で日本企業に波及する構図を理解する材料となる。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD-aligned disclosure spreads, this paper's distinction between motivated adoption and substantive implementation speaks to a core global concern: whether institutional pressure produces real green lending and credible reporting. Its Sub-Saharan Africa lens also highlights persistent geographic inequity in sustainable-finance scholarship and disclosure capacity.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:制度的圧力と組織的準備態勢を接合する統合フレームワークは、開示の実質性を測る実証研究の設計に有用。
🏢実務担当者:グリーン融資・サステナビリティ報告が形式的採用に終わらないよう、組織的準備態勢（動機・能力・資源）の整備が鍵となる。
🏛政策担当者:開示義務化が実質的実施を促すかは組織能力次第であり、能力構築支援の設計が政策効果を左右する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
While the global banking sector has become a critical field of sustainability governance, the academic literature on sustainable banking is geographically and theoretically disproportionate and lacks integration. This study outlines the intellectual structure of the field by conducting a bibliometric analysis of 1,890 peer-reviewed documents from January 2000 to April 2026 retrieved from the Scopus database and screened according to PRISMA 2020 protocol. The study was conducted using a two-phase design. First, performance analysis using VOSviewer and the R package with the Biblioshiny interface. Second, the results were interpreted from the integrated perspective of institutional theory and the R = MC2 organizational readiness framework. Findings reveal a 17.69% compound annual growth rate driven by coercive and normative institutional pressures, marginalization of Sub-Saharan Africa (approximately 7.2% of corpus output from only seven of 49 countries), and near absence of organizational readiness constructs from the field’s intellectual core. The study’s contribution is an integrated framework in which institutional pressures act as antecedents whose effects on green lending and sustainability reporting outcomes are proposed to be channeled through R = MC2 readiness capacities, generated from the synthesis rather than a bibliometrically demonstrated mechanism bridging literatures and offering a structure for distinguishing motivated adoption from substantive implementation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33466250.v1first seen 2026-09-10 04:49:08 · last seen 2026-09-10 04:49:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。