Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Stock Return Volatility
環境・社会・ガバナンス(ESG)パフォーマンスと株式リターンのボラティリティ (AI 翻訳)
Baldevsingh Gautam
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿はインドNIFTY50企業を対象に、ESGスコアと株式リターンのボラティリティの関係を分析。GARCHモデルで推定した条件付分散とESGスコアの関連を回帰分析した結果、有意な負の関係は確認されず、ESGパフォーマンスが短期的な株価変動リスクに与える影響は限定的であることを示した。
English
This study examines the link between ESG scores and stock return volatility among NIFTY 50 firms in India using GARCH models and cross-sectional regressions. It finds no significant relationship, suggesting that ESG performance does not materially explain short-term stock return volatility in this emerging market context.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドBRSR開示制度の下でESG情報が普及する中、本稿はESGと市場リスクの関連が短期的には限定的であることを示す。日本企業がインド市場に投資する際のリスク評価に示唆を与える可能性がある。
In the global GX context
The paper adds to the emerging market literature on ESG and financial risk, showing that despite mandatory ESG disclosure (BRSR), short-term volatility is not significantly explained by ESG scores. This informs global understanding of how sustainability metrics relate to market risk in non-Western settings.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on ESG-volatility linkage in an emerging market, highlighting the need for longer-term studies and more granular ESG data.
🏢実務担当者:Limited direct applicability for corporate sustainability teams, but investors may note the weak short-term link between ESG and volatility.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that mandatory ESG disclosure alone may not immediately impact market risk, implying complementary policies for long-term stability.
📄 Abstract(原文)
<p>This study examines the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and stock return volatility among firms constituting the NIFTY 50 index in the Indian equity market. Using daily stock price data spanning January 2021 to December 2025, firm-level volatility is estimated through GARCH(1,1) models, yielding measures of average conditional variance, logarithmic volatility, and volatility persistence (α + β). ESG scores sourced from National Stock Exchange of India disclosures serve as the primary explanatory variable in cross-sectional regression analysis.</p> <p>Descriptive statistics reveal that ESG scores among NIFTY 50 firms cluster within a narrow band (58–80), reflecting convergent sustainability disclosure practices among large-cap Indian companies. GARCH estimation confirms canonical features of financial return series, including volatility clustering and near-unit-root persistence. Correlation analysis indicates a weak negative association between ESG scores and logarithmic volatility; however, regression models across multiple volatility specifications yield statistically insignificant ESG coefficients, suggesting that ESG performance does not significantly explain cross-sectional variation in short-term stock return volatility within this sample.</p> <p>These findings imply that while ESG disclosure has become increasingly institutionalized in India—propelled by regulatory frameworks such as the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) mandate—its influence on short-term market risk remains limited. The results contribute to the nascent empirical literature on ESG and financial risk in emerging markets and suggest that sustainability practices may affect corporate outcomes primarily through long-term channels, including governance quality, stakeholder trust, and reputational capital, rather than through immediate changes in return volatility. Future research incorporating longer time horizons, granular ESG pillar-level scores, and broader samples may yield richer insights into the dynamics between sustainability performance and financial market risk.</p>
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6618218first seen 2026-06-11 05:14:01 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:36:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。