The Development of Sustainability Reports In Indonesia: Management Approaches and Performance Indicators (Case Study in the Energy Sector 2020-2024)
インドネシアにおけるサステナビリティ報告書の進展:管理アプローチと業績指標(エネルギーセクター2020-2024年のケーススタディ) (AI 翻訳)
Chairina Chairina, Novita Weningtyas Respati, Rasidah Rasidah, M. Nordiansyah, Enny Hardi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿はインドネシアのエネルギー企業を対象に、サステナビリティ報告書における管理アプローチと業績指標(経済・環境・社会・ガバナンス)の開示状況を分析。GRI基準に基づく内容分析の結果、ガバナンス開示は平均77.77%と高いが、経済(39.57%)、環境(40.47%)、社会(47.05%)の開示は低く、総合EESG開示は48.68%であった。また、経済的・社会的指標が財務業績に有意な影響を与えることを統計的に確認した。
English
This paper analyzes the sustainability reports of Indonesian energy companies from 2020-2024, focusing on management approaches and performance indicators (economic, environmental, social, governance) based on GRI standards. Findings show governance disclosure is relatively high (77.77%), while economic (39.57%), environmental (40.47%), and social (47.05%) disclosures are lower, with aggregate EESG disclosure at 48.68%. Statistical tests reveal that economic and social indicators significantly influence financial performance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本稿はインドネシアの事例だが、日本企業が同国で事業展開する際のサステナビリティ報告の状況を理解する上で有用。また、SSBJ等の国内開示基準の国際比較の文脈でも示唆がある。
In the global GX context
This study provides longitudinal evidence from an emerging market on sustainability disclosure practices and their link to financial performance, contributing to the global discourse on ESG reporting effectiveness under GRI standards.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the relationship between EESG disclosure and financial performance in an emerging market context.
🏢実務担当者:Benchmark for sustainability reporting quality in the Indonesian energy sector; highlights areas for improvement in economic, environmental, and social disclosures.
🏛政策担当者:Informs regulators on the current state of sustainability disclosure and potential areas for mandatory reporting requirements.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The issue of sustainability reports is a growing concern impacting numerous domestic and international companies. This phenomenon can be attributed to the emergence of sustainability report practices, which enhance corporate image and ensure corporate sustainability. This study utilizes a comprehensive dataset to assess the sustainability reports of Indonesian companies. The analysis employs two distinct types of information: a management approach to the extent of corporate governance disclosure and performance indicators (economic, environmental, and social performance) in sustainability disclosure reporting. A longitudinal approach was employed to evaluate developments up to 2020 – 2024, specifically for companies operating dengan 222 sampel in the energy sector , because the energy sector is an industry with a fairly significant operational impact on the environment. The content analysis framework aligns with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards. The findings indicate a positive development in the disclosure of information types, with companies reporting an average governance performance of 77.77% in corporate management. However, the disclosure of economic performance indicators (39.57%), environmental performance (40.47%), and social performance (47.05%) was found to be lower. Aggregate EESG (economic, environmental, social, and governance) disclosure was 48.68%. The quantity of information utilized exhibited considerable variation across diverse sustainability domains. This study also conducted additional testing by performing statistical tests to examine the impact of the disclosure of these two types of information (management approach-performance indicators) on financial performance. The findings indicate that economic and social indicators exert a substantial influence on financial performancems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.20527/jwm.v14i2.513first seen 2026-07-27 05:10:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。