← 論文一覧に戻る

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Drivers of Sustainability Transitions in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Why One Size Does Not Fit All

サブサハラ・アフリカにおける持続可能性移行のESG(環境・社会・ガバナンス)要因:画一的なアプローチが機能しない理由 (AI 翻訳)

Emmanuel Kwaku Manu, Bismark Asante, Gabriel Eweje

Business Strategy and the Environment📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-14#ESGOrigin: Global
DOI: 10.1002/bse.71275
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71275

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

サブサハラ・アフリカ39カ国(2000~2023年)のパネルデータを用い、ESG要因が持続可能性移行に与える影響を分析。環境圧力(炭素強度・エネルギー使用)は移行を阻害し、女性雇用などの労働市場要因は改善に寄与。規制の質とGDPが条件付け要因として機能し、非線形・動学的関係も確認。画一的な政策の非有効性を示し、文脈に応じたESG戦略の重要性を強調。

English

Using panel data from 39 sub-Saharan African countries (2000–2023), this study examines how ESG drivers affect sustainability transition performance. Environmental pressures (carbon intensity, energy use) consistently hinder transitions, while female employment improves outcomes. Regulatory quality and GDP per capita condition these effects, with nonlinear and dynamic patterns. Findings highlight heterogeneity and argue for context-specific ESG policies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業・政策担当者にとっては、新興市場におけるESG要素とエネルギー移行の複合的関係を理解する手がかりとなる。SSBJ対応では途上国サプライチェーンのScope 3評価にも示唆があるが、日本固有の含意は限定的。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global sustainability-transition scholarship by showing that ESG drivers operate heterogeneously across developing economies, challenging one-size-fits-all policies. For disclosure frameworks (TCFD/ISSB) it underscores the importance of country-level context when assessing transition risk and ESG performance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides panel evidence on ESG–sustainability transition linkages in SSA and highlights heterogeneity across countries.

🏢実務担当者:May inform ESG strategy and risk assessment for companies operating in African markets.

🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes context-specific policy design over uniform sustainability targets, relevant for developing economies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

ABSTRACT Despite growing emphasis on sustainability transitions in developing economies, evidence remains limited on how environmental, social and governance (ESG) conditions shape sustainability outcomes in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examines the environmental, social and governance drivers of sustainability transition performance across 39 SSA countries over the period 2000–2023. A composite sustainability transition performance index (STPI), constructed from renewable energy consumption and reverse‐coded energy intensity indicators, is used to capture transition performance. A multi‐method panel framework is employed to examine direct, conditional, nonlinear and dynamic relationships. The findings show that environmental pressures, particularly carbon intensity and energy use, consistently weaken sustainability transition performance, whereas labour‐market conditions, particularly female employment and female wage employment, improve sustainability outcomes. Governance conditions operate primarily through regulatory quality, which significantly conditions the relationship between environmental pressures and sustainability transition performance. In addition, GDP per capita shapes the sustainability effects of environmental and labour‐market drivers across countries. Nonlinear estimates reveal an inverted U‐shaped relationship between energy use and sustainability transition performance, while dynamic estimates indicate strong persistence over time. The findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in sustainability pathways, suggesting that one‐size‐fits‐all sustainability policies may be less effective in SSA and underscoring the importance of context‐specific ESG strategies. The study contributes to sustainability‐transition research by demonstrating how interacting ESG drivers shape heterogeneous sustainability transitions in SSA.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。