Fertilizer Chemical Toxicity And ESG Risk: Evidence From Indian Brsr Disclosures (Fy23-25)
肥料化学毒性とESGリスク：インドBRSR開示（FY23-25）からの証拠 (AI 翻訳)
D. Kushwaha, Ritesh Singh, Sameer Kumar, V. Trivedi, H. Tripathi, Deepak Tripathi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
肥料生産における化学毒性がESGパフォーマンスに与える影響を、インド上場肥料企業10社のBRSR開示データ（FY23-25）を用いて分析。毒性指数とCRISIL ESG格付けの間に強い逆相関を確認。ゼロ液体排出システム導入でESGスコア平均20ポイント向上。政策提言として、PLIスキームの低毒性バイオ肥料への再配分を提案。
English
This study analyzes the impact of chemical toxicity from fertilizer production on ESG performance using BRSR disclosures from 10 Indian listed firms (FY23-25). A strong inverse relationship between toxicity index and CRISIL ESG ratings is found. Zero-liquid discharge systems yield average 20-point ESG score gains. Policy recommendations include reallocating the PLI scheme toward low-toxicity biofertilizers.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準や有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む中、毒性指標とESGパフォーマンスの関連性を示す本分析は、化学産業の開示実務に示唆を与える。特に、有害物質管理がESG評価に直結する点は、日本の化学メーカーにも参考になる。
In the global GX context
As mandatory ESG disclosure expands globally (e.g., ISSB, CSRD), this study provides empirical evidence on how chemical toxicity disclosures serve as governance quality signals. It highlights the financial materiality of environmental metrics beyond carbon, relevant for investors and standard-setters.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence linking chemical toxicity to ESG ratings using Indian BRSR data, useful for disclosure scholarship.
🏢実務担当者:Demonstrates that reducing toxicity improves ESG scores and lowers borrowing costs, actionable for sustainability teams.
🏛政策担当者:Supports redirecting subsidies toward low-toxicity biofertilizers under India's PLI scheme.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This research investigates the influence of chemical toxicity from fertilizer production on ESG performance among India's leading agrochemical companies, utilizing three years of mandatory BRSR disclosures spanning FY23 to FY25. India's fertilizer industry, valued at ₹2.5 lakh crore and essential for feeding 1.4 billion people, creates substantial environmental challenges through GHG emissions, effluent discharge, hazardous waste generation, and groundwater contamination that erode corporate sustainability credentials. Through panel analysis of 10 NSE-listed firms representing 65% of sector market capitalization, we developed a composite toxicity index from standardized Principle 6 environmental metrics and examined its correlation with CRISIL ESG ratings. Our analysis identifies a robust inverse relationship between toxicity profiles and ESG outcomes, with emission intensity exerting the strongest influence. Companies implementing zero-liquid discharge systems secure substantial ESG score gains averaging 20 points, while persistent high-toxicity operations trigger investor aversion and higher borrowing costs. Paradeep Phosphates stands as a compelling case study, converting environmental stewardship into market leadership, complemented by Deepak Fertilisers practical strategies for emission mitigation. Bridging financial toxicology concepts with stakeholder theory, the study demonstrates how toxicity disclosures serve as critical signals of governance quality to institutional investors. These insights hold particular urgency as SEBI rolls out BRSR Core requirements with compulsory third-party assurance commencing FY26. Policymakers receive evidence supporting reallocation of the ₹20,000 crore Production-Linked Incentive scheme toward low-toxicity biofertilizer innovation. Corporate leaders gain actionable intelligence: each 10% toxicity reduction delivers tangible ESG uplift and financial premium, positioning compliant firms advantageously within expanding $40 trillion global ESG capital pools.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.16.43s.41first seen 2026-07-16 06:07:45
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。