Deconstructing Environmental Risk in Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Qualitative Study of Flood Risk Representation in Sumatra
企業サステナビリティ報告における環境リスクの脱構築:スマトラの洪水リスク表現に関する質的研究 (AI 翻訳)
Shivy Indah Novisari, Mega Devita Sari
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、スマトラの企業サステナビリティ報告における洪水リスクの表現を、Derridaの脱構築を用いて質的に分析した。森林・パルプ、金属・鉱業、電力、農業の4社の開示を検討し、環境責任が組織的イニシアチブやコンプライアンスに偏り、生態系の相互依存や累積的リスクが軽視されていることを示した。より実質的なサステナビリティ会計の必要性を提言する。
English
This qualitative study uses Derridean deconstruction to analyze flood risk representation in sustainability reports of four Sumatran companies (forestry, mining, power, agriculture). It finds that environmental responsibility is framed through organizational initiatives and compliance, while broader ecological interdependencies and cumulative risks are underrepresented. The authors call for more substantive sustainability accounting linking disclosures to environmental dependencies and risks.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示が始まり、気候リスクの定性的・定量的開示が求められる中、本論文は開示の質的側面(リスクの枠組み方)への示唆を与える。特に洪水リスクなど物理的リスクの表現方法は、日本企業の有報・統合報告書でも参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, as ISSB and CSRD push for more rigorous climate risk disclosure, this paper highlights how corporate reporting can obscure systemic environmental risks. It offers a critical lens for standard-setters and practitioners to assess whether disclosures truly capture ecological dependencies, relevant for TCFD-aligned reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a qualitative method (deconstruction) to critique sustainability disclosure completeness, useful for scholars studying climate risk representation.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for sustainability teams to improve risk framing and avoid underrepresenting cumulative environmental risks in reports.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that disclosure standards may need to emphasize systemic risk connectivity, informing future regulatory guidance.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study examines how environmental risks, particularly flood risk, are represented in corporate sustainability reporting in Sumatra. Using an interpretive qualitative approach, the study applies qualitative document analysis and Derridean deconstruction to sustainability disclosures from four corporate entities operating in forestry and pulp, metals and mining, electric power generation, and agriculture and plantations. The findings indicate that, in the cases examined, environmental responsibility is predominantly communicated through organizational initiatives, compliance activities, conservation programmes, and operational risk management, while broader ecological interdependencies and cumulative environmental risks receive comparatively less explicit representation. Flood risk is frequently framed through climatic, technical, or operational narratives rather than broader relationships among land use, watershed conditions, ecological degradation, and corporate responsibility. The study concludes that sustainability reporting may enhance environmental visibility while simultaneously limiting the visibility of broader accountability relationships, highlighting the need for more substantive sustainability accounting that connects corporate disclosures with environmental dependencies, impacts, and risks. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana risiko lingkungan, khususnya risiko banjir, direpresentasikan dalam pelaporan keberlanjutan korporasi di Sumatra. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif interpretif, penelitian ini menerapkan analisis dokumen kualitatif dan dekonstruksi Derrida terhadap pengungkapan keberlanjutan dari empat entitas korporasi yang bergerak di sektor kehutanan dan pulp, pertambangan logam, pembangkitan tenaga listrik, serta pertanian dan perkebunan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pada kasus yang dianalisis, tanggung jawab lingkungan terutama dikomunikasikan melalui inisiatif organisasi, aktivitas kepatuhan, program konservasi, dan pengelolaan risiko operasional, sementara keterkaitan ekologis yang lebih luas dan risiko lingkungan kumulatif relatif kurang direpresentasikan secara eksplisit. Risiko banjir cenderung dibingkai melalui narasi iklim, teknis, atau operasional daripada melalui hubungan yang lebih luas antara penggunaan lahan, kondisi daerah aliran sungai, degradasi ekologis, dan tanggung jawab korporasi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pelaporan keberlanjutan dapat meningkatkan visibilitas lingkungan sekaligus membatasi visibilitas hubungan akuntabilitas yang lebih luas.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.21009/wahana.21.015first seen 2026-08-05 05:01:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。