← 論文一覧に戻る

サステナビリティのストーリーテリングから検証されたインパクトへ:Tentreeの事例研究

From Sustainability Storytelling to Verified Impact: A Case Study of Tentree (原題)

E. Toplu, Can Toplu

International journal of business management📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-04#グリーンウォッシュOrigin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: apparel
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v21n5p32
原典: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/53596/58488
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本稿は、アパレルブランドTentreeの事例を通じて、自然関連のサステナビリティ主張を活動ベースのストーリーテリングから検証されたインパクト報告へ移行する方法を検討する。信頼性のある主張のための5つの要件(明確な定義、透明な証拠、独立検証、成果ベース報告、限界の説明)を提示し、2024年インパクトレポートの進展と課題を分析する。

English

This article examines how sustainable apparel brands can move nature-based claims from activity-based storytelling to verified impact reporting, using Tentree as a case. It identifies five requirements for credible claims and analyzes Tentree's 2024 Impact Report, highlighting progress and areas for improvement such as survival rates and additionality.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、サステナビリティ情報開示の信頼性が問われる中、グリーンウォッシュ規制やSSBJ開示への対応が進む。本稿の検証フレームワークは、日本企業が自然関連主張を開示する際の実践的指針となる。

In the global GX context

Globally, with rising greenwashing scrutiny and frameworks like ISSB and CSRD, this case offers practical guidance for credible nature-based claims, relevant for companies and assurance providers.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:活動ベースと成果ベースの主張の区別に関する理論的枠組みを提供。

🏢実務担当者:自然関連主張の検証と報告の実践的チェックリストを提供。

🏛政策担当者:グリーンウォッシュ規制や開示基準の設計に示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Sustainable apparel brands increasingly employ environmental claims to differentiate themselves in markets shaped by climate concern, consumer skepticism, and heightened scrutiny of greenwashing. Nature-based claims, particularly tree planting and ecosystem restoration, are attractive because they are tangible, emotionally resonant, and easy to communicate. However, the number of trees planted does not, by itself, demonstrate durable climate, biodiversity, or community outcomes. This article examines how sustainable apparel brands can move nature-based sustainability claims from activity-based storytelling to verified impact reporting. It uses a conceptual, illustrative case-based analysis of Tentree, a Canadian sustainable apparel brand, drawing on literature on sustainable fashion, greenwashing, consumer trust, nature-based solutions, and sustainability assurance. The analysis identifies five requirements for credible nature-based claims: clear claim definition, transparent evidence, independent verification and assurance, outcome-based reporting, and accountability for limitations and risks. Tentree’s 2024 Impact Report demonstrates meaningful progress through specific tree-planting figures, restoration partnerships, sustainability certifications, carbon-footprint reporting, material traceability, and emerging nature-related disclosure commitments. The case also indicates that future credibility could be strengthened through consistent project-level disclosure of survival rates, carbon and biodiversity outcomes, evidence of additionality, leakage-risk assessment, and corrective actions for restoration projects that underperform. The article contributes to sustainable marketing and corporate sustainability literature by distinguishing activity-based claims from outcome-based impact reporting and by offering practical guidance for more transparent, verified sustainability communication.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。