From Uncertainty to Resilience: How ESG Scores Moderated Market Capitalization Shocks amid the Russian Invasion of Ukraine
不確実性から回復力へ：ロシアのウクライナ侵攻におけるESGスコアが時価総額ショックを緩和した方法 (AI 翻訳)
Kristjan Jespersen, Katryn Pasaribu, Andreas Gonzalez Elsgaard, Jonas Aastrup Nielsen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ロシアのウクライナ侵攻という地政学的ショック下で、ESGスコアが企業の時価総額を保護したことを実証。2188社のパネルデータ（2012-2023年）を用い、特に環境・社会スコアが損失緩和に有効。追加分析では、賃金格差指標が従来のガバナンス指標より優れていた。経済的影響は中程度だが、ESGの重要性を示唆。
English
This study demonstrates that higher ESG scores, especially environmental and social components, protected firm market capitalization during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Using panel data on 2,188 firms from 2012-2023, it finds that ESG factors buffered losses. Additional tests reveal that salary gap metrics outperformed traditional governance measures. The economic impact is moderate but statistically significant, highlighting ESG's growing relevance under geopolitical stress.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業にとって、地政学的リスク下でのESGパフォーマンスの緩衝効果を示すエビデンス。SSBJやコーポレートガバナンス・コードの文脈で、ESG投資をリスク管理ツールとして位置づける根拠となる。国際的な投資家からの要求が強まる中、日本企業のESG開示の重要性を裏付ける。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical support for ESG materiality during geopolitical crises, relevant for global frameworks like ISSB and SEC climate disclosures. The finding that salary gaps outperform traditional governance metrics challenges existing governance evaluation methods. It underscores the role of ESG disclosures in financial resilience, informing policymakers on disclosure value.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:For GX researchers, this paper offers causal-like evidence of ESG scores moderating market capitalization shocks in a quasi-experimental setting (Russian invasion). It suggests future research on long-term valuation effects and alternative governance metrics.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use these findings to argue that ESG improvements, particularly environmental and social, serve as risk mitigation tools during crises, justifying ESG investments.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can note that ESG factors provided resilience during the Ukraine crisis, supporting mandatory ESG disclosures as part of market stability mechanisms.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Geopolitical instability, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, has a significant impact on firms’ market capitalization. This study investigates how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores influence market capitalization during the invasion—a period marked by severe geopolitical disruption. This study employs a robust panel estimation approach using comprehensive firm-level data for 2,188 companies from the Refinitiv Eikon database, covering the period from 2012 to 2023. Results show that higher ESG scores—particularly in the environmental and social categories—offered meaningful protection against market capitalization losses, particularly during the conflict. Additional robustness tests using alternative indicators—emissions, labor turnover, and salary gaps—found that salary gap metrics outperformed traditional governance measures in explaining firm value during the crisis. While the economic impact is moderate, the statistical significance of ESG factors underscores their growing relevance in investment decisions under geopolitical stress. The findings point to the need for further research into the long-term valuation effects of ESG performance beyond short-term crises.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2026.007first seen 2026-07-26 05:41:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。