開示と説明責任:持続可能性報告および企業行動に関する文献レビュー
PENGUNGKAPAN DAN AKUNTABILITAS: TINJAUAN LITERATUR ATAS PELAPORAN KEBERLANJUTAN SERTA PERILAKU PERUSAHAAN (原題)
Sukmawaty Siahaan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
持続可能性報告と企業行動の関係を会計・経営・サステナビリティ分野横断で整理した文献レビュー。報告は説明責任・リスク認識・長期志向を促し得るが、その行動的影響は不均一で文脈依存だと指摘する。多くは正当性獲得や制度的圧力による象徴的開示にとどまり、実質的変革にはガバナンス品質・規制執行・ステークホルダー監視が鍵となる。新興国・セクター差・内部統制との統合に研究ギャップがあるとする。
English
A literature review synthesizing research on how sustainability reporting shapes corporate behavior across accounting, management, and sustainability fields. Reporting can improve accountability, risk awareness, and long-term orientation, but behavioral effects are uneven and context-dependent. Much disclosure is symbolic, driven by legitimacy and institutional pressures; substantive change depends on governance quality, regulatory enforcement, and stakeholder scrutiny. Gaps remain for emerging economies, sectoral variation, and integration with internal governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
SSBJ基準・有報サステナ開示の義務化が進む日本では、開示が「形式」か「実質」かを問う本レビューの視点は、統合報告書の質的評価や投資家対話の設計に示唆を与える。規制執行とガバナンス品質が実効性を左右する点は国内制度設計にも直結する。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD/SEC climate rules push disclosure from voluntary to mandatory, this review's core question—when does reporting drive real accountability versus symbolic compliance—speaks directly to global disclosure scholarship. Its emphasis on enforcement and governance quality informs debates on assurance, greenwashing, and transition-plan credibility.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:開示と企業行動の因果・条件要因を整理する枠組みとして、実証研究の設計や変数選択に活用できる。
🏢実務担当者:自社のサステナ開示が象徴的開示に陥っていないか、ガバナンス・内部統制との統合を点検する視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:開示義務化の実効性は規制執行と監視の強度に依存するという示唆を、制度設計に反映できる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
ABSTRACT The growing emphasis on sustainability reporting has elevated non-financial disclosure as a central mechanism for enhancing corporate transparency and accountability. Beyond its communicative role, sustainability reporting is increasingly expected to influence corporate behavior by shaping managerial decision-making, strategic priorities, and organizational practices. This study presents a literature review that synthesizes prior research examining the relationship between sustainability reporting and corporate behavior across accounting, management, and sustainability disciplines. The review highlights that sustainability reporting can encourage improved accountability, risk awareness, and long-term strategic orientation; however, its behavioral impact remains uneven and context-dependent. A substantial body of literature indicates that sustainability reporting is frequently motivated by legitimacy-seeking and institutional pressures, resulting in symbolic disclosure rather than substantive organizational change. The effectiveness of sustainability reporting in driving meaningful behavioral transformation is shown to depend on factors such as governance quality, regulatory enforcement, and stakeholder scrutiny. This review contributes to the literature by clarifying the conditions under which sustainability reporting moves beyond disclosure toward genuine accountability, while identifying research gaps related to emerging economies, sectoral variations, and the integration of sustainability reporting with internal governance mechanisms. Keywords: Sustainability reporting; Corporate behavior; Accountability; ESG disclosure ABSTRACT Peningkatan perhatian terhadap sustainability reporting telah menjadikan pelaporan non-keuangan sebagai instrumen utama dalam mendorong transparansi dan akuntabilitas perusahaan. Lebih dari sekadar sarana komunikasi, sustainability reporting diharapkan mampu memengaruhi perilaku perusahaan melalui perubahan dalam pengambilan keputusan manajerial, orientasi strategi, dan praktik organisasi. Artikel ini menyajikan tinjauan literatur yang mensintesis penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya mengenai hubungan antara sustainability reporting dan perilaku perusahaan dalam bidang akuntansi, manajemen, dan keberlanjutan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa sustainability reporting berpotensi meningkatkan akuntabilitas, kesadaran risiko, serta orientasi jangka panjang perusahaan, namun dampak perilakunya masih bersifat tidak merata dan sangat bergantung pada konteks. Sejumlah studi menemukan bahwa praktik pelaporan keberlanjutan sering kali didorong oleh tekanan legitimasi dan institusional, sehingga menghasilkan pengungkapan yang bersifat simbolik dibandingkan perubahan organisasi yang substantif. Efektivitas sustainability reporting dalam mendorong perubahan perilaku yang nyata dipengaruhi oleh kualitas tata kelola, kekuatan regulasi, dan tingkat pengawasan pemangku kepentingan. Literatur review ini berkontribusi dengan memperjelas kondisi di mana sustainability reporting dapat bergerak dari sekadar pengungkapan menuju akuntabilitas yang bermakna, serta mengidentifikasi peluang riset lanjutan di negara berkembang dan lintas sektor. Kata Kunci: Sustainability reporting; Perilaku perusahaan; Akuntabilitas; Pengungkapan ESG
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.47491/landjournal.v7i2.4831first seen 2026-11-05 04:41:05 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:29:17
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。