gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

An Ethical Reorientation of Good Corporate Governance: The Integration of Human Dignity Values into Sustainability Accounting in the Context of Indonesia’s Climate Crisis

良いコーポレートガバナンスの倫理的再方向付け:インドネシアの気候危機における持続可能性会計への人間の尊厳価値の統合 (AI 翻訳)

Jurnal Ilmiah Accusi, Ferdila, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Ibnu, Sina

Jurnal Ilmiah AccUsi📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-06#ESG
DOI: 10.36985/5b95bq33
原典: https://doi.org/10.36985/5b95bq33

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、インドネシアの気候危機において、技術主義的でコンプライアンス重視の持続可能性会計が人間の尊厳を軽視していると批判する。人間の尊厳を統合した新たなガバナンスモデルを提案し、グリーンウォッシュを抑制し、気候リスクへのレジリエンスを高めることを目指す。

English

This study critiques technocratic sustainability accounting in Indonesia's climate crisis, arguing it fails to address human dignity. It proposes a conceptual model integrating human dignity into governance and reporting to reduce greenwashing and enhance climate resilience.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文はインドネシアに焦点を当てているが、持続可能性会計における倫理的基盤の重要性を強調しており、日本のSSBJや有報におけるガバナンス改革にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX discussions by critiquing compliance-driven sustainability accounting and proposing an ethical framework centered on human dignity, relevant to greenwashing debates and climate justice.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:This paper offers a conceptual model integrating human dignity into sustainability accounting, challenging technocratic approaches.

🏛政策担当者:Indonesian policymakers may consider incorporating human dignity into the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy; global regulators can reflect on ethical dimensions of disclosure frameworks.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The increasing intensity of hydrometeorological disasters in Indonesia highlights the limitations of corporate governance and sustainability accounting practices in responding to the human dignity of the climate crisis. Although frameworks such as Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and the Indonesian Sustainable Finance Taxonomy (TKBI) have been implemented to promote sustainability, their implementation tends to be technocratic and compliance-oriented, thus failing to adequately capture the social vulnerability and humanitarian impacts of corporate activities. This study aims to examine these limitations and propose an ethical reorientation of GCG through the integration of human dignity as the primary normative foundation. This study uses a conceptual qualitative approach with a narrative literature review method and a critical analysis of the regulatory framework, sustainability accounting practices, and governance structures in Indonesia. The results show that sustainability accounting is still often used as an instrument of formal legitimacy, rather than as an ethical accountability mechanism, thus opening up space for greenwashing practices and weakening its effectiveness in responding to risks related to the climate crisis. In response, this study develops a conceptual model that integrates human dignity into governance structures, climate risk management processes, the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, and sustainability reporting systems. The proposed model demonstrates that the integration of human dignity can create a more holistic and ethically grounded approach to corporate accountability, emphasizing the protection of human life, reduction of social vulnerability, and increased resilience to climate risks. This research contributes to expanding the sustainability accounting literature by going beyond technocratic and compliance-based approaches and positioning human dignity as a normative framework for evaluating corporate responsibility in the context of the climate crisis

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。