← 論文一覧に戻る

Beyond ESG Scores: Exploring Financial Mediation for Energy Sector Growth in Indonesia and Thailand

ESGスコアを超えて:インドネシアとタイにおけるエネルギーセクター成長のための財務媒介の探求 (AI 翻訳)

Thriyani Rahmania, W. Ermawati, G. Suprayitno, Jul Thanasrivanitchai

Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-01-30#ESG対象セクター: energy
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jam.2025.023.4.15
原典: https://jurnaljam.ub.ac.id/index.php/jam/article/download/8989/2356
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、インドネシアとタイのエネルギー企業におけるESGスコアと持続可能な成長率の関係を、財務業績を媒介変数として検証。Refinitivデータから55の観測値(2019-2023)を用いたパネルデータ回帰の結果、ESGの直接効果はなく、財務業績は成長率に影響するが、ESGとの媒介効果はないことが示された。ESG統合がまだ持続可能な成長の鍵となっていないことを示唆。

English

This study examines the impact of ESG scores on sustainable growth rate of energy companies in Indonesia and Thailand, with financial performance as mediator. Using panel data regression on 55 observations from Refinitiv (2019-2023), it finds no direct ESG impact, but financial performance directly affects growth. Financial performance does not mediate ESG-growth relationship. Results suggest ESG integration is not yet a key strategy for sustainable growth in these sectors.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本稿はインドネシア・タイのエネルギー企業におけるESGスコアの効果を実証。日本企業のASEAN進出やサプライチェーン対応において、ESGスコアのみに依存せず財務パフォーマンスとの連動が重要であることを示唆する。

In the global GX context

This paper adds to the literature on ESG-financial performance-growth link in emerging economies. It shows that in policy contexts with weaker enforcement, ESG may not directly translate to sustainable growth, questioning universal applicability of ESG frameworks. Relevant for global investors assessing emerging market energy sectors.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on ESG-sustainable growth link in energy sectors of Indonesia and Thailand, useful for comparative ESG effectiveness studies.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need to align ESG initiatives with financial performance for growth, rather than relying solely on ESG scores.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests that stronger policy enforcement and integration of ESG into core business strategy are needed for sustainable growth in the energy sector.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Indonesia and Thailand face high disaster risks and severe environmental degradation, particularly due to unsustainable practices in the energy sector. This situation highlights the urgent need for companies to adopt sustainable business models to ensure long-term growth and resilience. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance scores on the Sustainable Growth Rate of energy sector companies in Indonesia and Thailand, considering the mediating role of financial performance. The research employs a quantitative explanatory approach. The population consists of all energy sector companies listed in Indonesia and Thailand, with non-probability Sampling used to select companies that disclose ESG data in the Refinitiv database for the period 2019 to 2023, resulting in a total of 55 observations. Using panel data regression with a Random Effects Model and the estimation method Cluster-Robust Finite-Sample Standard Error. This estimation approach was chosen to overcome the limited number of companies and the potential for heteroscedasticity between cross-sectoral units. The results show no significant direct impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance on Sustainable Growth Rate, in contrast to financial performance, which has a significant influence. Additionally, financial performance does not have a mediating effect between Environmental, Social, and Governance pillars and Sustainable Growth Rate. This suggests that ESG implementation in these energy sectors has not yet evolved into a key strategy for sustainable growth, highlighting the need for stronger policy enforcement and comprehensive Environmental, Social, and Governance integration to improve sustainability and investor confidence.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。