海事サステナビリティ報告書における環境談話：インドネシア企業とグローバル海運企業の比較研究
Environmental Discourse in Maritime Sustainability Reports: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Global Shipping Companies (原題)
Ryan Puby Sumarta, Agus Budiarte, Zohri Hamdani, Muhammad Idris, Aliong Silalahi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシア国営海運2社と多国籍海運2社の2024年サステナビリティ報告書を、批判的談話分析と言語学理論で比較した質的研究。国営企業は公共責任・ガバナンス・国民連結性・地域福祉を、多国籍企業はイノベーション・脱炭素・気候リーダーシップ・技術変革を強調する。制度文脈と組織アイデンティティが環境談話を規定することを示し、「公共サービス型」と「グローバル・リーダーシップ型」の2モデルを提示する。
English
A qualitative critical discourse analysis of 2024 sustainability reports from two Indonesian state-owned and two multinational shipping firms. Indonesian SOEs foreground public responsibility, governance, and national connectivity, while multinationals emphasize innovation, decarbonization, and climate leadership. The study identifies two discourse models shaped by institutional context and organizational identity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも海運・物流企業の統合報告書やSSBJ対応開示が進む中、国営・公共性の強い事業者が「公共責任」を、グローバル企業が「脱炭素リーダーシップ」を語る構図は、商船三井・日本郵船などの開示戦略や国内制度文脈との比較材料になる。談話分析の視点は、有報・統合報告書の環境記述の質的評価に応用可能。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD push shipping firms toward standardized climate disclosure, this study shows how institutional context still shapes environmental narratives—state-owned operators framing sustainability as public service, multinationals as decarbonization leadership. It adds a discourse-level lens to disclosure scholarship, useful for comparing Global North and emerging-market reporting under a common framework.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:開示テキストを談話分析で読み解く手法と、制度文脈が環境ナラティブを規定する証拠を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:自社の環境記述が公共責任型かリーダーシップ型かを相対化し、ステークホルダー期待に沿った報告トーン設計に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:国営・公共性の高い事業者の開示が公共サービス志向に偏る傾向を踏まえ、脱炭素情報の標準化・比較可能性確保の必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Background: Environmental sustainability has become a strategic priority in the maritime industry, making sustainability reports an important medium of corporate communication. However, limited studies have examined how environmental responsibility is constructed through language across different institutional contexts. Objective: This study aims to compare environmental discourse construction in sustainability reports of Indonesian and multinational shipping companies and explore the role of institutional context, organizational identity, and stakeholder expectations. Methods: A qualitative document analysis was conducted using the 2024 sustainability reports of PT PELNI (Persero), PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), and CMA CGM. The analysis applied Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis framework integrated with Systemic Functional Linguistics, Appraisal Theory, Legitimacy Theory, and Ecolinguistics. Results: The findings reveal two environmental discourse patterns. Indonesian state-owned enterprises emphasize public responsibility, governance, national connectivity, and community welfare, while multinational companies highlight innovation, decarbonization, climate leadership, and technological transformation. These differences indicate that sustainability discourse is influenced by institutional context and organizational identity. Conclusion: This study identifies two discourse models: Public Service Sustainability Discourse and Global Sustainability Leadership Discourse. The findings contribute to sustainability communication research by highlighting corporate sustainability reports as an emerging genre of Maritime English and English for Specific Purposes (ESP), while supporting their use as authentic materials for developing critical discourse awareness and professional communication skills in maritime education.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i4.896first seen 2026-09-18 04:47:59
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。