← 論文一覧に戻る

アジア市場におけるサステナブルファイナンスと移行経済：資本市場モデル、司令統制モデル、集中リスクモデルの比較研究

Sustainable Finance & Transition Economics in Asian Markets: A Comparative Study of the Capital-Market, Command-Control, and Concentration-Risk Models (原題)

Uzzaman, Md. Arif-

Crossrefプレプリント2026-01-01#トランジション・ファイナンスOrigin: Global経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: finance
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7017558
原典: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7017558

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本報告は、中国、日本、シンガポール、インドネシア、バングラデシュ、モンゴルの6カ国におけるサステナブルファイナンスのアプローチを比較し、3つの市場モデル（資本市場型、司令統制型、集中リスク型）を提案する。各モデルには固有の弱点があり、共通して「約束と実行のギャップ」が存在する。環境成果の検証可能性を高めることがアジア全体のサステナブルファイナンス強化の鍵と結論づける。

English

This report compares sustainable finance approaches across China, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Mongolia, proposing a Three-Model Framework (Capital-Market, Command-Control, Concentration-Risk). Each model has unique weaknesses, and a common promise-to-performance gap exists. The report concludes that improving verification of environmental outcomes is the next step for strengthening sustainable finance across Asia.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示や移行ファイナンスの実践が進む中、アジア諸国との比較視点は日本の政策・規制の位置づけを相対化するのに有用。特に、日本の金融システムがどのモデルに該当し、その弱点が何かを示唆する点で、国内の持続可能な金融戦略の検討に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, this comparative framework adds to the discourse on transition finance and sustainable finance regulation, particularly in emerging Asian markets. It highlights the promise-to-performance gap and the need for robust verification mechanisms, which is relevant for ISSB and other disclosure standards as they seek to ensure credibility.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for analyzing sustainable finance models across Asian markets, useful for further empirical research.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into regulatory and market structures that affect sustainable finance implementation, helping corporate teams navigate regional differences.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the promise-to-performance gap and the need for verification mechanisms, informing policy design for sustainable finance.

📄 Abstract（原文）

<p>The biggest challenge that Asia is currently facing is to balance environmental responsibility and economic growth. Although many of the countries have introduced various green finance policies and ambitious climate targets, they continue to face various challenges due to how their financial system is structured. This report compares the approaches of China, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Mongolia towards sustainable finance through a comparative case-study analysis. The information used in this study was collected solely from the publicly available data, regulatory documents, central bank publications, multilateral development bank records, and financial news reports.</p> <p>Through the three case studies, this report developed a Three-Model Framework that consists of the Capital-Market Model, the Command-Control Model, and the Concentration-Risk Model. The framework suggests that each type of market model has its own unique weaknesses in implementing sustainable finance. Despite these problems, a common promise-to-performance gap exists across all three models, where sustainable finance is not defined by the commitments, but rather by measurable and verifiable environmental outcomes. The report further suggests that countries are unlikely to follow only one of the three models, as financial systems, technologies, regulatory frameworks, and climate policies continue to evolve over time. Instead, improving the verification of environmental outcomes should become the next step in strengthening sustainable finance across Asia.</p>

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。