A Network Approach to Scope 3 Emissions
Scope 3排出量へのネットワークアプローチ (AI 翻訳)
Nicolas Romero Diaz, Maximiliano Udenio, Wim Van Hyfte, David Veredas
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ネットワークベースの手法を用いて企業の間接的な温室効果ガス排出量をサプライチェーン全体で推定する。取引データと排出データを組み合わせ、取引関係のみからも推定可能であることを示す。FactSetとTrucostのデータを用いた分析では、推定値の方が報告値より高いケースが多く、下流排出が間接排出の約61%を占める。SBTi認証企業で誤差が小さいことを確認し、データ品質が推定精度の主要因であると結論付ける。
English
This paper develops a network-based methodology to estimate firms' indirect Scope 3 emissions across supply chains, using monetary transaction data and Scope 1 & 2 emissions, and shows comparable results can be obtained using only transactional links. Applying the method to FactSet and Trucost data from 2010-2021, they find higher upstream estimates for ~60% of firms, and downstream emissions account for ~61% of total indirect emissions. Validation with SBTi-certified firms shows lower discrepancies, indicating data quality drives estimation error.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJがScope 3開示を求める方向にあり、ネットワーク推計手法はTrucostやFactSetなどのデータがない企業でも取引関係のみから簡易にScope 3を推定できる可能性を示しており、実務上有用である。
In the global GX context
With ISSB and CSRD requiring Scope 3 disclosures, this network-based method offers a way to estimate emissions using only transactional links, which is valuable for firms with limited data. Validation against SBTi targets underscores the importance of data quality for accurate reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The network approach provides a methodological advance for estimating Scope 3 emissions, validated with SBTi targets, useful for further research on supply chain carbon accounting.
🏢実務担当者:Companies can use this method to approximate Scope 3 emissions even without detailed monetary data, aiding in meeting disclosure requirements and SBTi targets.
🏛政策担当者:The finding that data quality drives estimation error suggests regulators should prioritize improving emissions data infrastructure.
📄 Abstract(原文)
<div> We develop a network-based methodology to estimate firms’ indirect greenhouse gas emissions across upstream and downstream value chain tiers. The model initially requires monetary transaction data and suppliers’ and clients’ Scope 1 and 2 emissions,&nbsp; </div> <div> but we show that comparable results are obtained using only the existence of transactional links, without requiring monetary values. </div> <div> Applying the method to global supply chain data from FactSet combined with Trucost emissions data, we find that our approach yields higher upstream emissions estimates for roughly 60% of firms between 2010 and 2021. Additionally, we find that downstream emissions account for the majority of indirect emissions, averaging about 61% of total value chain emissions.&nbsp; </div> <div> We validate the model by exploiting a subsample of firms with SBTi-verified Scope~3 targets as a proxy for higher-quality reporting. Across multiple matched samples, SBTi-certified firms exhibit significantly lower absolute discrepancies between reported and estimated emissions, suggesting that data quality is a primary driver of estimation error rather than systematic bias in our methodology. </div>
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6385039first seen 2026-06-11 04:42:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。