ESG Ratings, Profitability and Cost of Capital: A Firm-Level Analysis
ESG格付け、収益性と資本コスト：企業レベルの分析 (AI 翻訳)
Messaoude Nebie, Alamgir Muhammad, Ming-Chang Cheng
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2015～2022年にかけて80カ国以上、1万社以上の企業を対象に、ESGスコアと財務業績（ROA、ROE、WACC）の関係をパネルデータ分析により調査した。OLSでは正の相関、固定効果モデルでは負の相関が見られ、PVAR分析により動的な相互作用が示された。ESGの財務効果は方法論や時間軸に依存する複雑な関係であることが明らかになった。
English
This study examines the relationship between ESG ratings and financial performance (ROA, ROE, WACC) using panel data from over 10,000 firms across 80+ countries (2015-2022). OLS models show positive associations, but fixed effects reveal negative relationships, and PVAR indicates dynamic interactions over time. The findings highlight that the financial impact of ESG performance is complex and contingent on methodology and context.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもSSBJ基準の適用が進む中、ESGスコアと資本コストの関係を実証する本結果は、企業の情報開示や投資家対応に示唆を与える。特に、固定効果モデルで見られた負の関係は、日本企業の特性を考慮した分析の重要性を示唆する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global debate on ESG materiality and its impact on cost of capital, relevant for ISSB/TCFD frameworks and transition finance discussions. The dynamic panel analysis offers methodological insights for researchers and standard-setters.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides robust empirical evidence on ESG-financial performance link using dynamic panel methods, with attention to endogeneity and specification choices.
🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams understand potential financial implications (profitability and cost of capital) of ESG improvements and disclosure.
🏛政策担当者:Informs regulators about the methodological sensitivity of ESG-finance relationships, cautioning against one-size-fits-all conclusions in standard-setting.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings and firm financial performance across a comprehensive global sample of over 10,000 companies from more than 80 countries observed in 2015–2022. Using panel data analysis, we examine how overall ESG scores and their components affect the Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). We employ several econometric approaches designed for panel data, including the univariate approaches; static (Pooled OLS; Fixed Effects) and a multivariate approach (Panel Vector Autoregression; PVAR) to address potential endogeneity concerns and provide robust findings. Our results revealed a complex relationship between ESG performance and financial outcomes. While OLS models generally show positive associations between ESG scores and profitability measures, Fixed Effects models indicate some negative relationships, suggesting that unobserved firm-specific factors are crucial. PVAR results highlight important dynamic interactions between ESG performance and financial metrics over time. These findings contribute to stakeholder theory by demonstrating that the financial implications of ESG performance are contingent on methodological approaches, time horizons, and specific contexts. Our research has important implications for corporate managers, investors, and policymakers seeking to understand the financial consequences of sustainability practices.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6834/pdf?version=1783248883first seen 2026-07-18 08:15:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。