Sustainability disclosure regulations in the EU: an enabling factor for impact investors?
EUにおけるサステナビリティ開示規制:インパクト投資家にとっての促進要因? (AI 翻訳)
Brigitte Bernard-Rau, Johannes Maximilian Freiling
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUのサステナブルファイナンス開示規則(SFDR)がインパクト投資家の目標とどの程度整合しているかを質的研究により分析。インタビューから、報告負担、不明確な製品分類、非効果的な指標など、規制と実践のミスマッチが明らかになった。改善策として、明確なラベル、柔軟な開示要件、インパクト創出基準の強化を提案している。
English
This paper examines the alignment of the EU's Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) with impact investors' goals through semi-structured interviews. Findings reveal a regulatory-practice misalignment including reporting burden, ambiguous product categorizations, and ineffective metrics. Impact investors propose clearer labels, flexible disclosure, and a stronger focus on impact-generating criteria.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもSSBJや有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む中、本論文は開示規制と実務の乖離を示し、日本が規制設計を行う上で示唆に富む。特にインパクト投資の視点は、日本ではまだ浸透していないが、今後の政策に反映すべき重要な論点である。
In the global GX context
As the EU's SFDR is a pioneering sustainable finance disclosure regulation, this paper provides critical insights for global regulators (ISSB, CSRD) on how to align disclosure rules with impact investors' needs, highlighting the risk of regulatory-practice misalignment and offering actionable recommendations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This study offers a practitioner-informed conceptualization of regulatory-practice misalignment in sustainable finance disclosure, contributing to regulation theory and impact investing literature.
🏢実務担当者:Impact investors can use the findings to advocate for regulatory improvements and better navigate SFDR compliance while maintaining focus on real-world impact.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should consider the identified gaps—such as ambiguous categories and metrics—when refining SFDR or designing similar regulations in other jurisdictions.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Purpose This paper aims to examine impact investors’ perceptions of the sustainable finance disclosure regulation (SFDR) and evaluates how effectively it helps impact-generating investors in achieving positive social and environmental impacts and broader sustainable transformations. Design/methodology/approach The authors conduct an exploratory qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with impact investment professionals. The data were analysed using a structured, interpretive approach to identify patterns in how practitioners interpret and implement the SFDR in their day-to-day work. Findings The findings reveal a regulatory-practice misalignment between the objectives of the SFDR and impact investors’ goals of generating positive real-world changes. Despite improving comparability and transparency, the reporting burden, ambiguous product categorizations and ineffective metrics are identified as key concerns of the SFDR. Impact investors propose the adoption of clear labels, increased flexibility in disclosure requirements and a stronger focus on impact-generating criteria to mitigate these drawbacks. Practical implications The findings provide policy recommendations to European legislators and policymakers on refining the SFDR to better align with the needs, goals and practices of impact investors. Social implications Impact investors offer financial products with strong potential to generate social and environmental change. Aligning the SFDR with impact-generating practices ensures that the regulation effectively supports such investments. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to provide a practitioner-focused analysis of how impact investors interpret and operationalize the SFDR. It contributes to sustainable finance regulation research by conceptualizing the misalignment between regulatory design and impact investing practices as regulatory-practice misalignment.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-06-2025-0830first seen 2026-07-22 06:25:06
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。