CSR and Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Roles of Financial Performance and Legitimacy
CSRと企業の持続可能性:財務パフォーマンスと正当性の媒介的役割 (AI 翻訳)
Linda Yuliani Hutadjulu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、CSRが企業の持続可能性に寄与するメカニズムを、財務パフォーマンスと社会的正当性という2つの媒介経路から検証した。2021~2025年のScopus掲載文献の系統的レビューにより、CSRは持続可能性、財務パフォーマンス、制度的正当性に正の影響を与えるが、その効果は実施品質と制度環境に依存することを確認。新興市場では規制圧力によるCSR導入が多く、実質的関与による利益が制限される。財務パフォーマンスと正当性が相互に強化する同時媒介者として機能することを示した。
English
This study examines how CSR contributes to corporate sustainability through financial performance and social legitimacy as mediating pathways. A systematic review of Scopus papers (2021-2025) confirms CSR positively affects sustainability, financial performance, and legitimacy, but effects depend on implementation quality and institutional context. In emerging markets, CSR is often regulatory-driven, limiting benefits. The study shows financial performance and legitimacy are simultaneous, mutually reinforcing mediators.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はインドネシアなどの新興市場に焦点を当てており、日本のGX文脈(SSBJや有報)とは直接関連しないが、規制主導のCSRが持続可能性にもたらす課題について示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
For global GX context, this paper contributes to understanding how CSR drives sustainability outcomes, with implications for sustainable finance regulations in developing economies. It highlights the role of legitimacy and financial performance as mediators, relevant for firms and policymakers implementing ESG frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper provides a systematic review of CSR-sustainability linkages, integrating multiple theories and highlighting mediating roles of financial performance and legitimacy.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use these findings to design CSR strategies that enhance both financial returns and legitimacy, particularly in emerging markets.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in developing economies should consider that regulatory pressure alone may limit CSR benefits; substantive engagement requires supportive institutional environments.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has evolved from a philanthropic obligation into a strategic instrument through which firms pursue long-term sustainability. Despite growing scholarly interest, the mechanisms connecting CSR to sustainability outcomes remain insufficiently examined, particularly in developing economy contexts. This study investigates how CSR contributes to corporate sustainability through two parallel mediating pathways, financial performance and social legitimacy, drawing on legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory, and positive accounting theory as an integrated analytical framework. A systematic literature review of Scopus-indexed publications from 2021 to 2025 was conducted, with findings synthesised through classification, thematic analysis, and critical evaluation. The results confirm that CSR positively influences corporate sustainability, financial performance, and institutional legitimacy, supporting all three hypotheses proposed. These effects are conditional on implementation quality and the institutional environment in which firms operate. In emerging markets, including Indonesia, firms frequently adopt CSR in response to regulatory pressure rather than genuine strategic commitment, which constrains the financial and legitimacy gains that substantive engagement would otherwise generate. This study extends prior research by showing that financial performance and legitimacy function as simultaneous and mutually reinforcing mediators rather than independent channels, and it challenges the assumption that a positive CSR-sustainability relationship is universally applicable. The findings offer practical guidance for firms and policymakers in developing economies navigating rapidly expanding sustainable finance regulations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.56943/joe.v5i2.1007first seen 2026-06-02 05:23:55 · last seen 2026-06-14 04:50:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。