← 論文一覧に戻る

From Policy to Practice: Challenges of Environmental Data Generation and Digital Product Passport Readiness for Circular Garments Under EU Circular Textile Regulations

政策から実践へ:EU循環型繊維規制下での環境データ生成とデジタルプロダクトパスポート準備の課題 (AI 翻訳)

Harri Moora, Mariliis Haljasorg, Sirli Pehme, Hira Wajahat Malik, Reet Aus

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-13#開示インフラOrigin: EU経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: textile
DOI: 10.3390/su18147127
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147127
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、EUのエコデザイン規則(ESPR)とデジタルプロダクトパスポート(DPP)が繊維メーカーに求める環境データ要件への対応状況を、パキスタン・バングラデシュ・トルコの調査とエストニア代表チームのアップサイクル衣料の事例から分析。LCA専門性不足、データ断片化、PEF規則の複雑さなどの障壁を特定し、段階的導入と簡素化された評価手法を提言する。

English

This study examines readiness of garment manufacturers for EU ESPR and Digital Product Passport (DPP) requirements, using surveys in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Turkey and a case study of upcycled garments for Estonia's Paris 2024 team. It identifies barriers such as limited LCA expertise, fragmented data, and PEF complexity, recommending phased implementation and simplified assessment approaches.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業もEU市場向け繊維輸出でDPP対応が必須となる可能性が高く、SSBJ開示と同様にサプライチェーン全体のデータ整備が課題。本研究の障壁分析は、日本企業の対応戦略立案に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on DPP readiness gaps in global supply chains, informing EU policy implementation and offering lessons for other regions adopting similar disclosure frameworks, such as ISSB and CSRD.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides empirical data on DPP implementation barriers and methodological challenges for LCA in textile supply chains.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights specific data and capability gaps that manufacturers must address to comply with EU DPP requirements.

🏛政策担当者:Supports phased DPP implementation and harmonized guidance to ensure equitable transition for non-EU suppliers.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The fashion and textile industry is undergoing profound transformation driven by regulatory, environmental and societal pressures to reduce its significant contributions to global waste, emissions and resource depletion. In the European Union (EU), this transition is being formalised through the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which introduces mandatory sustainability and circularity requirements for textile products, including the Digital Product Passport (DPP). The emerging DPP framework is expected to include product-specific, life-cycle-based environmental information requirements, creating new compliance obligations for garment manufacturers supplying the EU market, particularly those based outside the EU. This study examines the readiness of global garment manufacturers to meet these requirements, with a focus on data availability, supply chain traceability, and alignment with the methodological expectations of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) framework. A mixed-methods approach is employed, combining a survey of garment manufacturers in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Turkey with a case study of upcycled garments produced for the Estonian national team for the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. The findings identify key barriers to generating DPP-compliant environmental data, including limited life cycle assessment (LCA) expertise, fragmented and inconsistent upstream datasets, insufficient digital data systems and the practical complexity of applying PEF Category Rules across diverse production contexts. The case study further demonstrates how data gaps constrain the assessment of innovative circular materials, revealing a mismatch between regulatory expectations and current industry capabilities. Overall, this study highlights the need for phased DPP implementation, simplified cradle-to-gate assessment approaches and clearer, more harmonised methodological guidance to support an achievable and equitable transition towards sustainable textile supply chains.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。