← 論文一覧に戻る

A review of recent developments in ESG and corporate finance

ESGとコーポレート・ファイナンスにおける最近の動向のレビュー (AI 翻訳)

Jian Yu

Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-24#ESGOrigin: Global経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.54254/2977-5701/2026.33100
原典: https://jaeps.ewapub.com/article/view/33100.pdf
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、ESGと企業財務の統合に関する研究を5つの伝達経路(情報、リスク管理、ステークホルダー関係、イノベーション、資本配分)に整理。信頼性の高い実証研究に焦点を当て、ESGの価値創造は業界のマテリアリティやガバナンス品質に依存することを示す。特に資金調達コストの低減とテールリスクの軽減にESGが有効であるという証拠が最も頑健である。

English

This review organizes research on ESG and corporate finance into five transmission channels: information, risk management, stakeholder relations, innovation, and capital allocation. Focusing on credible identification, it finds that ESG value creation is conditional on industry materiality and governance quality. The most robust evidence supports ESG's role in reducing financing costs and mitigating tail risks.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示基準の導入が進む中、ESGと企業価値の関連性を整理した本レビューは、開示対応や投資家対話の根拠として有用。特に資金調達コスト低減のエビデンスは、日本企業のサステナビリティ経営の実践に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This review provides a structured framework for understanding how ESG affects firm value, relevant to global disclosure standards like ISSB and TCFD. It clarifies the conditions under which ESG creates value, aiding investors and companies in navigating the transition to sustainable finance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a synthesized framework of ESG transmission channels and identifies boundary conditions for future empirical work.

🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence on ESG's impact on cost of capital and risk mitigation, useful for sustainability strategy and disclosure.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations into corporate finance has generated extensive yet fragmented research. Existing findings are heterogeneous, and causal claims are often undermined by measurement noise, selection bias, and pronounced ESG rating divergence. This lack of consensus obscures the mechanisms through which ESG affects firm value. To address this gap, this paper reviews recent developments by organizing evidence around five transmission channels: information, risk management, stakeholder relations, innovation, and capital allocation. Focusing on studies with credible identification, the review synthesizes findings on financial performance, cost of capital, climate risk, disclosure, governance, and engagement. The analysis reveals that ESG value creation is conditional, depending systematically on industry materiality, governance quality, and institutional context. The most robust evidence supports ESG's role in reducing financing costs and mitigating tail risks, while evidence of persistent alpha remains mixed. By clarifying boundary conditions and mechanisms, this review provides an integrated framework that reconciles prior inconsistencies. The paper concludes with implications for managers, investors, and policymakers and outlines promising frontiers in climate finance and machine-learning-based measurement. This synthesis thus offers a structured foundation for future theoretical and empirical inquiry.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。