Greenwashing vs Transparency: A Bibliometric Perspective
グリーンウォッシング対透明性：計量書誌学的視点 (AI 翻訳)
Loso Judijanto, Nurganda Siregar, Rani Eka Arini
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、グリーンウォッシングと透明性に関する学術文献を計量書誌学的手法で分析した。2000年から2024年までのScopusデータを用い、共著関係、引用、共語、国別協力パターンを調査。グリーンウォッシングは依然として主要テーマであり、透明性はデジタル技術や金融商品と関連していることが明らかになった。
English
This bibliometric analysis maps the intellectual structure of greenwashing and transparency literature from 2000-2024 using Scopus data. Findings show greenwashing remains dominant, while transparency is increasingly linked to digital tools and green finance. International collaboration is growing but geographically uneven.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準の適用が進む中、グリーンウォッシング問題は投資家対応の重要課題である。本論文の文献分析は、透明性向上のための国際的な研究動向を把握するのに有用。
In the global GX context
This study provides a global overview of the academic landscape on greenwashing and transparency, relevant for ISSB and CSRD implementation. It highlights the growing role of digital verification in sustainability reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The bibliometric mapping identifies key contributors, thematic clusters, and research gaps in greenwashing and transparency literature, offering a foundation for future studies.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can understand the evolving landscape of transparency tools, including blockchain and green finance, to enhance report credibility.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can see how greenwashing persists in ESG disclosures and the importance of digital verification and regulation to ensure transparency.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Greenwashing and transparency have emerged as two competing yet interconnected paradigms in the discourse on corporate sustainability. While greenwashing represents the manipulation or exaggeration of environmental performance, transparency reflects a firm’s commitment to honest, verifiable disclosure. This study employs a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer to map the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and collaborative patterns in the academic literature related to these two concepts. Based on a curated dataset from the Scopus database covering publications from 2000 to 2024, the analysis applies co-authorship, citation, co-word, and country collaboration techniques to uncover key contributors, emerging topics, and research gaps. Findings reveal that greenwashing remains a dominant theme, deeply embedded in literature on ESG, accountability, and sustainability reporting, while transparency is increasingly linked to digital technologies and financial instruments aimed at ensuring reporting credibility. Thematic clusters show evolving interest in areas such as green finance, blockchain, and supply chain transparency. Author and institutional networks reflect growing international collaboration, though notable disparities exist in geographic representation. This study contributes to a clearer understanding of the academic field and provides a foundation for future interdisciplinary research aimed at combating greenwashing and promoting transparent corporate sustainability practices.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。