This page provides an English interface to the gxceed GX paper corpus. The corpus aggregates papers from 13 open scholarly metadata sources and uses AI-assisted classification to identify signals related to measurement, policy narratives, outcomes, implementation, industrial adoption, and verification.
The goal is not only to discover papers, but to observe how GX research is distributed across research substance, implementation narratives, external expectations, implementation substance, and judgment formation.
Summaries are AI-assisted. Always refer to the original paper for authoritative conclusions.
Showing 101–120 of 129 papers
Patricia Manley, Nicholas Povak
The PROMOTE model quantifies climate-informed management strategies across ten resource pillars (including biodiversity) for ecosystem-wide conservation assessment. Applied to the western US, it finds that carbon and biodiversity conservati…
Nicola Raimo, Ilenia Fraccalvieri, Vitiana L’Abate +2
This study analyzes biodiversity disclosure practices of 131 European banks through manual content analysis of their official websites. Findings reveal that biodiversity remains a marginal component of banks' sustainability communication, w…
Javier Fajardo, Heather C Bingham, Dan Brockington +22
This study examines the social implications of Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which aims to protect 30% of land and sea by 2030. Under different implementation scenarios, large and socially diverse populatio…
Abregú Y.O.
This paper proposes a dual-workflow framework for evaluating the impacts of the pulp and paper industry on nature. While specific methods and case studies are not detailed, it may offer a novel approach to environmental impact assessment in…
Wang F.
This study examines the effect of green finance on corporate biodiversity risks. It suggests that green finance mechanisms can reduce biodiversity risks.
Sibylle Rouet-Pollakis, David Leclère, Marta Kozicka +13
This report documents the quantification of the VITAL-Paths-Food pathways, three value-explicit transformative pathways for food and biomass systems that meet global biodiversity, climate, and human well-being goals. It analyzes efforts and…
S. Ostapchuk, N. Tsaruk
This paper systematizes land-use indicators for sustainability reporting, analyzing international standards and corporate reports of Ukrainian agricultural companies. It finds that disclosure evolves from basic land area to a multidimension…
(著者不明)
This paper introduces NatureDep scores that quantify firm-level dependence on ecosystem services. It finds a positive correlation with biodiversity impact but no relation to nature-related actions disclosed in the CDP survey, highlighting a…
(著者不明)
This study empirically examines how biodiversity risks influence corporate cash holding policies. It finds that firms facing higher biodiversity risks adjust their cash holdings, with disclosure tone moderating the relationship.
(著者不明)
This paper analyzes the recent recognition of biodiversity risks as financial risks and examines the current state and challenges of corporate biodiversity disclosures. It reviews international disclosure frameworks and suggests future dire…
(著者不明)
This thesis empirically investigates whether bonds labelled for biodiversity and nature conservation (e.g., blue bonds, forest bonds) command a premium or discount relative to conventional bonds. The findings contribute to understanding mar…
Jasenthu Kankanamge Sajeep Sankalpa, Md Sarwar Hossain, Cecilia Tortajada +1
This paper systematically reviews 171 articles on barriers and enablers for nature-based solutions (NbS) in agriculture. It finds that NbS remain small-scale, geographically uneven, and primarily publicly funded. Two archetypes are identifi…
Adebayo A.
This paper proposes integrating research on biodiversity, extinction, and ecology into sustainability reports under ISSB standards S1 and S2. It also suggests incorporating such research into ISSB work plans to enhance disclosure frameworks…
Puthuma Joy
This study evaluates Kerala's climate governance progress in 2024-2025, analyzing the revised State Action Plan on Climate Change (SAPCC 2.0), GHG inventory development, research projects, and capacity building. It also examines biodiversit…
Maheshika Senanayake, Fajar Kristanto Gautama Putra, R. P. Gregory +3
This study compares biodiversity and ESG disclosure practices of Indonesian and Korean companies in Indonesia. While sustainability reporting increased significantly, only 7% treated biodiversity as material and 27% aligned with GRI 304. Ko…
S. Luxton, D. I. Avila-Ortega, S. Dunnett
This Special Feature presents emerging methods for integrating biodiversity into business and finance, building on frameworks like TNFD and SBTN. It covers natural capital accounting, ecosystem assessment, biodiversity footprinting, and oth…
HE Jing, YU Yang, SUN Lingxiao +6
This study analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution of four key ecosystem services (water yield, habitat quality, etc.) in arid Northwest China from 2000 to 2020. It proposes ecological connectivity optimization under the dual pressures of cli…
Guangqian Kuang, Xingming Jin, Hong Jin +3
This study investigates how benthic faunal diversity affects the stability of nitrogen removal and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands under antibiotic disturbance. The findings suggest that higher diversity may enhance stabili…
Nur Hasanah Gauch, Dede Sulaeman, Erica Villavelez +3
ASEAN's rich biodiversity and ecosystems (tropical forests, peatlands, mangroves, wetlands) are critical for carbon sequestration. The 2025 ASEAN Biodiversity Science Forum showcased cases combining indigenous knowledge with advanced techno…
Joseph Bull
This paper argues for the continued use of nature offsets, despite growing controversy. It emphasizes that major frameworks like the Global Biodiversity Framework explicitly include offsets, and that offsets provide crucial funding for natu…
Browse by Topic